Article Text

Download PDFPDF

210:oral Procedural fairness and UHC resilience: the case of health financing reform Ukraine
  1. Yuriy Dzhygyr
  1. Ukraine’s Minister of Finance and Minister of Health


Across the globe, the pandemic has struck social compacts no less than individual lives. Falling incomes and escalating healthcare needs have amplified public concerns over government choices in healthcare financing, stimulating new research on what could be realistically done to increase the perceived fairness of these decisions. This case study is part of a series of case studies contributing to development of guidance for policy makers on procedural fairness in health financing. The study examines applicability of the newly proposed criteria to the experience of the 2016-2017 health reform in Ukraine, focusing on the decisions of the Government to choose general taxation as the funding source for a newly established benefit package and the decision to replace a highly decentralized health financing system with a single-purchaser model.

The study is based on qualitative methods. Using a desk review, it examines the evolution of regulations and supportive documents, expert analysis and media content. This is supplemented by semi-structured interviews with the reform stakeholders, deliberately covering respondents with diverse opinions on the process and outcomes of the reform. The analysis shows both reform decisions are in line with global lessons and evidence on UHC reforms. They were also based on advanced procedural regulations with considerable transparency throughout the process. However, the changes were perceived as unfair by major and influential stakeholders, leading to ressentiment, and creating risks for reform sustainability. The study sheds light on how this outcome could have been pre-empted with a fairer process. The reform process was focused on technical accuracy, transparency and reasons-giving but underinvested in meaningful public participation. It makes a case for using the new procedural fairness criteria as an ex-ante diagnostic tool to support sustainable changes in health financing, especially if stakeholders are not well organized and lack coordination platforms.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: .

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.