Article Text

Download PDFPDF

161:oral A global redistributive auction for vaccine allocation
  1. Peder Skjelbred1,
  2. Aksel Braanen Sterri2
  1. 1University of Oxford; UK
  2. 2Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford; Oslo Metropolitan University


The current allocation of vaccines against COVID-19 is widely perceived to be unfair. While high-income countries are administering booster shots, low-income countries have barely received any doses. In attempting to improve upon the status quo and ensure a better distribution of vaccines in future pandemics, ethicists like Emanuel et al. (2021) have proposed a more equal allocation of vaccines. These frameworks have utterly failed to change the practice. In this paper, we join reformers in proposing a new scheme for vaccine distribution: a global auction for vaccines where profits are distributed fairly to participating countries. Our proposal improves upon previous suggestions ethically by taking countries’ differing valuations of money and vaccines seriously. Since an auction is in the interest of both vaccine manufacturers and high-income countries, it is also politically feasible. A global redistributive auction for vaccines thus promises to be a robust and ethically desirable way to allocate vaccines.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: .

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.