Article Text

Download PDFPDF

171:oral Promoting equity in rationing and beyond though disadvantage indices: assessing the potential of a novel approach
  1. Harald Schmidt
  1. Dept of Medical Ethics and Health Policy; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; USA


Background In the USA, Covid-19 exposed deep social, racial and ethnic inequities—but policy makers also deployed a major novel tool to promote equity within, and likely beyond, the pandemic, by modifying allocation frameworks with disadvantage indices (DIs, ie: place-based measures integrating census variables such as income, education or housing-situation, enabling ranking geographic areas as small as neighborhoods).

Objective To assess to what extent DIs have been adopted, and what their potential is to improve equity in, and beyond, Covid-19 allocation-decisions.

Methods A) structured review of US states’ use of DIs in the initial vaccine roll-out, (Schmidt et al. ‘Equitable allocation…’ Nature Medicine (27) 2021), C) literature scoping review of use of dominant DI (Pubmed/Embase/WebSc), D) Conceptual analysis.

Results In an unprecedented, rapid, and widespread effort, a majority of US states (n=34) added disadvantage indices in Covid-19 vaccine allocation plans. The dominant model is the CDC’s Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), developed for natural disaster response efforts (mapping well onto a conceptualization in the philosophical literature: Wolff/De-Shalit, ‘Disadvantage’, OUP 2007, as well as public preferences: Schmidt et al. ‘US adults’ preferences…’ JME, 2021). Main DI uses: planning dispensing site locations, targeted outreach/communication, increasing vaccine quantities, and monitoring uptake/course-correcting. Adapted forms were also used for tests and antiviral treatment allocation. The scoping review of SVI uses is ongoing at the time of submission; preliminary findings are that around 50% of N=119 publications use DIs ‘off-label’, ie in non-emergency settings, indicating an unmet need. Emergent themes include: budgetary allocations, healthcare service access planning, targeted prevention.

Discussion In Spring 2020, the dominant theme in Covid-19 allocation frameworks was maximizing overall benefits—often risking exacerbating existing inequities. The rapid and widespread DI adoption opened a major new chapter, holds major potential to improve equity in allocation beyond Covid-19, and should be explored further.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: .

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.