Introduction
There are increasing calls for an integrated health system response to the management of HIV infection and the growing non-communicable disease (NCD) epidemics in low-income and middle-income countries, aimed at addressing poor coverage of NCD services and evidence of a high burden of multimorbidity in people living with HIV.1 2
However, evidence for the benefits of integration is limited.3 Indeed, integration may have a negative impact on progress that has been made in HIV treatment programmes.4–6 There is little available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of integration or its overall impact on health systems.
In this review, we assess the extent to which national policies and guidelines for HIV and NCDs care, specifically care for diabetes and hypertension, in selected East African countries reflect the movement towards integration of HIV and NCD services.
The burden of HIV and NCDS
HIV infection remains a major public health issue with continuing high HIV incidence.7 The increased availability and uptake of highly active antiretroviral therapy has resulted in a decline in HIV associated mortality and an increase in life expectancy, turning HIV into a chronic medical condition requiring linkage into and retention in care, and all the necessary resources to maintain care delivery over the patient’s lifetime.2 8–10 In Africa, there are 15 million people on antiretroviral therapy who are at increased risk of developing NCDs due to ageing and the additional impact of long standing HIV infection and exposure to antiretroviral drugs.11
The global burden of NCDs has risen rapidly, causing 15 million premature deaths each year among people aged 30–69 years, with 85% of these deaths occuring in low-income and middle-income countries.12 NCD-related deaths are projected to increase at a higher rate in Africa compared with worldwide trends and could exceed deaths from infectious diseases by 2030.12 13
Evidence on the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension in low-income and middle-income countries is limited, although it is accepted that there is considerable underdiagnosis, that few people are in regular care, and fewer still are well controlled on treatment.14 15
Healthcare provision for HIV/AIDS and NCDS
The investment in HIV programmes has had both positive and negative effects on health systems in low-income and middle-income countries. It has strengthened health services through investment in physical infrastructure, laboratory capacity, health information systems, healthcare worker capacity development and promoting delivery of antenatal care, family planning and sexually transmitted infection (STI) management; but also diverted financial and human resources away from other health programmes.16 This is especially relevant where healthcare resources are severely constrained, and health systems are focused on managing acute infections.
Coverage of HIV services has recently improved with increasing numbers entering treatment programmes, being retained in care and achieving viral suppression. In Eastern and Southern Africa, antiretroviral therapy coverage was estimated at 67% with 87% of those on treatment having a suppressed viral load.17
In contrast, health service provision for NCDs in sub-Saharan Africa remains poor and evidence on adherence to treatment and retention in care is limited.18 Available evidence for both hypertension and diabetes suggests that retention in care deteriorates significantly after diagnosis and treatment initiation, to as low as less than 30% at 12 months.19 20 In a systematic review published in 2007, covering sub-Saharan Africa, less than 30% of people diagnosed with hypertension were on drug treatment.14
Integration of HIV/AIDS and NCD services
Integrated service delivery refers to:
the organisation and management of health services so that people get the care they need, when they need it, in ways that are user-friendly, to achieve the desired results and provide value for money, pg1.21
There is a lack of large, good-quality rigorous studies able to provide the evidence to support integration as a preferred approach to service delivery in low-income and middle-income countries.3 22 Methods of integrating services range from ‘adding’ a service to an existing service platform to full integration of parallel services.3 ‘Adding on’ a service may be cost saving and may increase service utilisation, however, does not necessarily improve service delivery nor patient outcomes when compared with vertical programmes. Full integration of services may also reduce the knowledge and utilisation of ‘special services’ and may not result in any improvements in health status.
The integration of health services has been on the agenda since the establishment of primary healthcare in the 1980s, and more recently as a means to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals and Universal Health Coverage.23–25
Several global HIV and NCD strategies encourage the integration of HIV and NCDs management. The most recent Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) targets include several on integration.24 26–28 Suggested reasons for recommending service integration include the epidemiological overlap between these conditions, with high prevalence of HIV and NCDs in many low-income and middle-income countries2 12 22; the increased risk of NCDs and high health burden when the conditions occur together,1 3 29 and the similar healthcare service provision strategies required to manage HIV and NCDs as chronic conditions.27
A further driver for HIV-NCD integration is the need for countries with a high HIV burden to develop efficient and cost-effective ways to deliver their HIV programmes as external funding for HIV programmes decreases.30 31
Models of NCD-HIV service integration
Several reviews have identified different models of HIV-NCD service integration.4–6 32 These include NCD prevention and control incorporated into existing HIV services; HIV prevention and control added to primary healthcare already providing NCD services, and simultaneous introduction of integrated HIV and NCD services.32
Benefits and risks of HIV-NCD integration
HIV programmes have developed considerable systems innovations including decentralised care, task-shifting, counselling, community engagement, drugs and diagnostics procurement and treatment adherence support for the management of HIV as a chronic condition, all of which could now be used to inform the development of other high-quality chronic care services.8 33 34
Potential benefits of HIV-NCD integration for the health system and patients include a reduction in duplication and fragmentation of services, which would increase efficiency of resource use and help patients remain in care by reducing costs and inconvenience for patients with multiple morbidities.32 34–36 Screening for NCDs within HIV care programmes can improve the identification of undiagnosed NCDs among patients living with HIV and also contribute to improved health outcomes.37–39
Possible disadvantages to the integration of HIV and NCD services include an increased workload for HIV or NCD programme staff which, particularly for HIV care, will require careful management.4 Successful integration of NCD care into HIV services will require an expansion of service provision overall, as well as significant systems reorganisation to allow documentation, drug delivery and healthcare worker support.40 HIV-NCD integration without appropriate resourcing runs the risk of reducing the quality of current HIV services without improving NCD care. There is also a risk that stigma may influence the uptake of services for NCD care.6
Role of national health policies, strategies and plans
National health policies, strategies and plans are the tools governments use to respond to the demands for change or improvement in health systems and healthcare delivery, providing direction and importantly financial support for change.41 Ideally, national health strategies, policies and plans, should be informed by robust evidence and used to create an efficient, effective health service.