You are here

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Commentary
No Jab, No Job? Ethical Issues in Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination of Healthcare Personnel

Authors

  • Rachel Gur-Arie Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USAOxford-Johns Hopkins Global Infectious Disease Ethics Collaborative, Oxford, UK, Baltimore, Maryland, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Euzebiusz Jamrozik Oxford-Johns Hopkins Global Infectious Disease Ethics Collaborative, Oxford, UK, Baltimore, Maryland, USAWellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Patricia Kingori Oxford-Johns Hopkins Global Infectious Disease Ethics Collaborative, Oxford, UK, Baltimore, Maryland, USAWellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr. Rachel Gur-Arie; rgurari1{at}jhu.edu; Dr. Patricia Kingori; patricia.kingori{at}ethox.ox.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Gur-Arie R, Jamrozik E, Kingori P
No Jab, No Job? Ethical Issues in Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination of Healthcare Personnel
BMJ Global Health 2021;6:e004877.

Publication history

  • Received December 26, 2020
  • Accepted January 14, 2021
  • First published February 17, 2021.
Online issue publication 
May 04, 2023

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.