Introduction Onchocerciasis is targeted for elimination mainly with annual community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI). High infection levels have been reported in South-West Cameroon, despite ≥15 years of CDTI. The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with continued onchocerciasis transmission and skin disease.
Methods A large-scale cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017 in 20 communities in a loiasis-risk area in South-West Cameroon. A mixed-methods approach was used. Associations between infection levels, skin disease and adherence to CDTI were assessed using mixed regression modelling. Different community members’ perception and acceptability of the CDTI strategy was explored using semi-structured interviews.
Results Onchocerciasis prevalence was 44.4% among 9456 participants. 17.5% of adults were systematic non-adherers and 5.9% participated in ≥75% of CDTI rounds. Skin disease affected 1/10 participants, including children. Increasing self-reported adherence to CDTI was associated with lower infection levels in participants aged ≥15 years but not in children. Adherence to CDTI was positively influenced by perceived health benefits, and negatively influenced by fear of adverse events linked with economic loss. Concern of lethal adverse events was a common reason for systematic non-adherence.
Conclusion CDTI alone is unlikely to achieve elimination in those high transmission areas where low participation is commonly associated with the fear of adverse events, despite the current quasi absence of high-risk levels of loiasis. Such persisting historical memories and fear of ivermectin might impact adherence to CDTI also in areas with historical presence but current absence of loiasis. Because such issues are unlikely to be tackled by CDTI adaptive measures, alternative strategies are needed for onchocerciasis elimination where negative perception of ivermectin is an entrenched barrier to community participation in programmes.
- public health
- control strategies
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
What is already known?
Targeting onchocerciasis elimination rather than morbidity control raises new challenges for community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI), particularly in areas of co-endemicity with Loa loa where fear of adverse events negatively impacts on participation and high transmission persists despite long-term CDTI.
What are the new findings?
Prevalence was high including among high adherers to CDTI (prevalence range 25% to 55% in ≥50 year-olds and 9 to 14 year-olds with self-reported high adherence, respectively), suggesting persistence of high transmission despite 15 rounds of CDTI.
Low adherence to CDTI and interrupted ivermectin uptake were mostly due to experienced or observed common ivermectin-related adverse events interfering with daily activities as well as their economic consequences.
Systematic non-adherence was related to fear of death and rumoured severe adverse events, which persisted despite the current very low prevalence and infection intensity of Loa loa.
Participants who were concerned about serious and lethal ivermectin-related adverse events did not directly relate those issues to loiasis.
What do the new findings imply?
CDTI alone, even improved with programme adaptive measures, is highly unlikely to eliminate onchocerciasis in such areas, where the fear of ivermectin adverse events and death is deeply anchored in the population and persists as a reason for systematic non-adherence despite the current quasi absence of high-risk levels of loiasis in the area.
Other alternative approaches such as vector control with ground larviciding and/or treatments avoiding direct microfilaricidal side effects, such as doxycycline, might be more acceptable in areas not only of current, but also of past co-endemicity with loiasis.
Onchocerciasis, or river blindness, is a neglected tropical disease caused by the filarial parasite Onchocerca volvulus, transmitted by blackflies of the genus Simulium.
In 2017, there were an estimated 20.8 million onchocerciasis cases, 99% of which occurred in the poorest and most vulnerable populations of sub-Saharan Africa.1 Onchocerciasis notably causes potentially irreversible impaired vision but most commonly presents as skin disease, which affects 70% of cases and caused over 90% of years lived with disability due to onchocerciasis in 2017.1–3
The WHO strategy against onchocerciasis consists of mass drug administration (MDA) with community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) and has shifted its goal from morbidity control to disease elimination with a target of 12 (31%) endemic countries verified for interruption of transmission by 2030.4
By killing the parasite larvae present in the skin, the microfilariae (mf), regular ivermectin (IVM) treatment both prevents further disease development and transmission to the blackfly vector.5 WHO recommends that annual MDA for at least 15 to 17 years of high coverage (80%) should reduce transmission and result in decreased skin infection incidence in children.2 6
Although 15 to 17 years of CDTI has achieved elimination in some African settings, high transmission levels persist in the face of long-term CDTI campaigns in other areas, particularly in communities living and working close to blackfly vector breeding sites in forested regions where year-round transmission occurs.7–12 An additional challenge is the risk of severe adverse events (SAEs) following ivermectin treatment in patients harbouring heavy Loa loa microfilaraemia, co-endemic with onchocerciasis.13 Reasons for low participation to CDTI are numerous and may include absence during drug distribution, negative perception of CDTI, fear of side effects and weak community ownership.9 14 15
The aim of this work was to document onchocerciasis infection and morbidity levels after 15 years of annual CDTI in previously identified persisting onchocerciasis hot spots, by assessing their association with adherence to CDTI, and identifying drivers of adherence and ivermectin uptake based on the case of these high-risk communities in South-West Cameroon.
Study area, design and participants
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted between June and October of 2017 in 20 communities in the Meme River Basin, South-West region, Cameroon, where onchocerciasis transmission was recorded between 2011 and 2012.7 The assessments presented here were conducted during the baseline survey of a controlled before-and-after community-based intervention study aiming at assessing the impact of WHO-endorsed alternative strategies to accelerate the elimination of onchocerciasis, that is, 35-day treatment of onchocerciasis cases with 100 mg doxycycline (test and treat with doxycycline), either alone or in combination with ground larviciding with temephos for vector control. Further details are available in the study protocol.16 First, a census of all study villagers was undertaken in all communities, and those aged ≥5 years and who had lived ≥5 years in the community were eligible.
Parasitological and questionnaire data
Enrolled participants were diagnosed for onchocerciasis with two skin snips taken from each iliac crest using a sterile 2 mm corneo-scleral punch (CT 016 Everhards 2218–15 C, Meckenheim, Germany). Mf counts were expressed as mf per skin snip. L. loa infection was diagnosed using a 50 µL thick blood smear prepared with blood collected by finger prick. Microfilariae were identified under light microscope and the counts were expressed as number of microfilariae per millilitre (mf/mL) of blood.16 Information on socio-demographics, self-reported adherence to CDTI and recent medical history was collected with individual structured questionnaires. Pre-control O. volvulus prevalence and community microfilarial load (CMFL) for six of the study communities were obtained from previous reports.7 17
Onchodermatitis clinical assessments
Onchodermatitis diagnosis was conducted, using a formal clinical classification and coding system, by district hospital nursing staff specifically trained by an expert dermatologist.16 18
Onchocercal skin disease (OSD) was classified as acute papular onchodermatitis (APOD), chronic papular onchodermatitis (CPOD), lichenified onchodermatitis, depigmentation, atrophy or hanging groin.18 Non-onchocercal skin diseases included scabies, dermatophytes and pyoderma. Severe itching was defined as either itching reported spontaneously with emphasis in response to open-ended questions about general health or reported when prompted with a follow-up probe asking specifically about itching as either troublesome itching disturbing sleep or as severe.19
Semi-structured qualitative interviews
To investigate reasons for participation or non-participation in annual CDTI, interviews were conducted with community members who tested negative for onchocerciasis and were offered IVM as standard treatment, 24 interviewees accepted and 16 declined IVM. Community members were purposefully selected based on demographic characteristics including age, sex and location.16 Interviews were also conducted with community drug distributors (CDD) (n=26) to gain insight into their experience of community acceptance of CDTI. Interviews were conducted in 9 out of the 10 representative communities because one community could not be accessed (due to a blocked road).
Qualitative data analysis
Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated from Pidgin to English. The transcripts and field notes were analysed with NVivo software using a framework approach as described by Ritchie, et al 2013.20 The framework was developed both inductively and deductively. After familiarisation, coding frameworks were developed and all data was coded, charted and synthesised by gender and age groups.
Census data was collected with ODK (Open Data Kit, July 2010, http://opendatakit.or) and cleaned in Microsoft Excel. Parasitological and questionnaire data were entered with EpiInfo V.3.5.2 (EpiData Association; Odense, Denmark). Further data management and analysis were performed in Stata V.15.0 (StataCorp LP; College Station, Texas, USA).
Infection status was defined as positive if at least one microfilaria was found in either skin snip, or negative otherwise. The CMFL, that is, infection intensity at community level, was calculated as the geometric mean of the community infection intensity among individuals aged 20 years and above, including the negatives.21 Self-reported adherence to CDTI was expressed as the proportion of rounds taken out of the maximum of rounds the person could have taken given their age. Variables were categorised as described in online supplemental file 1.
CIs were estimated accounting for the cluster design of the study. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare proportions. The association between infection levels or symptoms of onchocerciasis and adherence to CDTI or other variables of interest was assessed using mixed-effects logistic (O. volvulus mf prevalence, nodule presence or clinical sign prevalence) or negative binomial (mf load) regression models with community as a random effect. All models were adjusted for factors unevenly distributed between participants enrolled or non-enrolled in the parasitological study. Other variables were selected based on the likelihood ratio test (LRT) at 20% level significance and Akaike’s information criterion for correlated variables (see online supplemental file 1 for further details). Two-way and three-way interactions between age, sex and adherence to CDTI, or self-reported adherence and time since last treatment were checked and assessed using the LRT. CIs for interactions were estimated using the Stata ‘lincom’ command. Marginal probabilities of, and the effect of adherence levels on, O. volvulus prevalence, intensity and nodule prevalence were estimated with the respective multivariate models and plotted using the Stata command ‘margins’ and ‘marginsplot’.
All censused individuals were explained the objectives and procedures of the intervention study. Informed assent was obtained from children and adolescents aged under 18 years with parental consent, and consent was provided by all adult participants (age ≥18 years). All participants diagnosed with O. volvulus infection were offered treatment as described in the study protocol paper.16
Role of the funding source
The funder (Department for International Development; UK-AID) had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The corresponding author confirms that he has full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Study population and participation in the baseline survey
Out of a total of 19 915 participants determined by community census at baseline, 1935 were aged <5 years, 8515 were absent, refused to participate or lived <5 years in the community, 9 had incomplete demographic data. As a result, 9456 (52.6% of eligible) participants were included in the parasitological survey. Among those, 238 and 103 participants had none or incomplete adherence to CDTI data, respectively. A study diagram is provided in online supplemental file 2 and participant characteristics are available in online supplemental file 3.
All models were adjusted for unbalanced characteristics between enrolled and non-enrolled participants, that is, age, gender, occupation and education.
Sensitivity analysis of complete cases (presented here) versus missing values for incomplete adherence data addressed using multiple imputation provided the same results, probably due to the low proportion of missing values (data not shown).
O. volvulus and L. loa infection levels, and adherence to CDTI
The overall prevalence of O. volvulus was 44.4% (95% CI: 39.2 to 49.8), ranging between 31.3% (95% CI: 26.5 to 36.6) and 75.5% (95% CI: 69.7 to 80.7) at community level. Three villages were hypoendemic and three were still hyperendemic. Study villages endemicity levels are displayed in figure 1A. The mean CMFL was 2.06 (range across communities: 0.82 to 3.59). A maximum (arithmetic) mean mf count of 538.5 per skin snip was found in a 9-year-old boy. The prevalence of L. loa was 3.7% (95% CI: 2.4 to 5.6), range across communities: 1.4% to 11.5%). The mean L. loa infection intensity was 49.5 mf/mL and ranged among positives between 0.5 and 1860 mf/mL, this maximum being below the 8000 mf/mL threshold associated with a high risk for ivermectin-related SAEs.
Village level O. volvulus prevalence rates and CMFL, as well as L. loa prevalence are available in online supplemental file 4.
Most participants (4079/4946, 82.5%) aged ≥20 years (ie, who were ≥5 years when CDTI reached 65% coverage) declared having taken IVM at least once. Over a quarter of participants (17.5%) reported being systematic non-adherers (ie, never took IVM), with similar proportions among men and women. Only 5.89% (95% CI: 3.57 to 8.16) of adult participants (age ≥18 years) reported high adherence (participation in ≥75% of rounds). Figure 2 displays age and gender-specific self-reported adherence levels (2A), and proportion of high adherers (2B). Adherence increased with increasing age and was lowest in the 14 to 29 years, regardless of gender.
Comparison of pre-CDTI and post-CDTI infection levels in a subset of communities
Pre-control and current O. volvulus mf prevalence and CMFL estimates are displayed in figure 1B. CDTI had a strong impact on the CMFL. The impact on prevalence was more modest and varied considerably across communities. Although three of those villages are currently the only hypoendemic villages in the area, they still all have prevalence rates above 30% (Bombanda 31.3%, Bombele 32.2% and Small Massaka: 34.3%).
Association between adherence to CDTI, infection levels and presence of nodules
Figure 3 displays O. volvulus mf prevalence ((3A), mf load (3B) and nodule prevalence (3C)) estimated as a function of age and self-reported adherence using the mixed-multivariate models presented in table 1. Unadjusted ORs are presented in online supplemental file 5.
Women had lower infection levels (all three outcomes) than men. Recent IVM treatment (≤1 year) was associated with lower odds of mf or nodule prevalence and lower mf loads.
The relationship between self-reported adherence and each of the three outcomes varied across age groups (effect modification), but not across gender. Self-reported adherence to CDTI was associated with lower infection levels in participants aged ≥30 years (figure 3D,E), but not in children, and its protective effect increased with increasing adherence (figure 3A,B).
Our model estimated that, compared with an adherence level of 50% to 75%, adhering to ≥75% of rounds resulted in a significant additional mf prevalence reduction of −9.7% (95% CI: −0.2 to −19.0%) and −15.5% (95%CI: −5.4 to −25.7%) in the 30 to 49 years and the ≥50 years, respectively.
Among high adherers, children had higher infection levels than adults aged ≥30 years and this difference was significant for children and adolescents aged 9 to 14 years (figure 3A,B).
Nodule prevalence was not associated with adherence but increased with age and was significantly higher in participants aged above 15 years (figure 3C,F).
Prevalence of clinical signs
OSD affected 10.3% (95% CI: 8.8 to 12.0) of participants, most of them (865/972, 89.0%), being diagnosed with only one OSD, the others having up to three OSDs.
The prevalence of OSD increased with age, ranging for any OSD from 6.57% (95% CI: 5.4 to 8.0) in children and adolescents aged below 15 years to 20.6% (95% CI: 17.0 to 24.7) in adults aged over 50 years. Online supplemental file 6 displays the prevalence of OSD among participants aged above and below 15 years, that is, born before and during the CDTI era. Younger participants mostly suffered from reactive skin disease whereas chronic depigmentation, atrophy, hanging groin (long-term development OSD) were more common among participants aged over 30 years.
Severe itching affected 5.85% (95% CI: 4.57 to 5.45) of participants. Visual impairment/vision problem was reported by 2.32% (95% CI: 1.29 to 4.15) of participants.
Non-onchocercal skin disease was rare, with 160 cases of infection with dermatophytes (prevalence: 1.69%, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.68), 76 cases of pyoderma (prevalence: 0.08%, 95% CI: 0.06 to 1.07) and 32 cases of scabies (prevalence: 0.34%, 95% CI: 0.013 to 0.086).
The prevalence of palpable nodules was 17.1% (95% CI: 15.3% to 19.0%) and most participants (94.2%) had one to three nodules. The maximum number of palpable nodules, 20, was observed in a 65-year-old woman.
Association between onchocercal skin disease, infection status and adherence to CDTI
Age-specific OSD prevalence rates were estimated using mixed–multivariate regression models. They are presented in online supplemental file 7 and illustrated in online supplemental file 8. The results of the bivariate analysis (unadjusted ORs) are presented in online supplemental file 9. The association between OSD was stronger with nodule number than with nodule presence (data not shown). Only depigmentation, atrophy and severe itching were associated to some extent with infection levels (either mf presence or load).
In the multivariate analysis, only depigmentation and severe itching (borderline non-significance) were associated with O. volvulus infection while APOD, CPOD and depigmentation were positively associated with nodule number (online supplemental file 7).
Men and women had similar risks of suffering from any OSD. The odds of suffering from depigmentation (OR=3.39 (95% CI 2.61 to 4.40) for the 50+ years age group compared with participants aged 30 to 49 years) or atrophy (OR=2.51 (95% CI 1.56 to 4.05) for the 50+ years age group compared with participants aged 30 to 49 years) increased with age. With regard to adherence to CDTI, early onset OSD tended to be positively associated with increasing adherence but the association was significant for APOD only. High adherence appeared to be associated with decreased risk of depigmentation and atrophy in participants aged 50 years and above, although not significantly, probably due to the low proportion of high adherers in this setting resulting in small sample size for these cross-categories.
Severe itching was more likely to be reported by participants aged ≥15 years, women and participants who ever took IVM, particularly high adherers. All three forms of reactive skin disease were associated with severe itching, with an increasing strength of association across APOD (OR=3.79, 95% CI (2.58 to 5.56), CPOD (OR=6.63 95% CI 4.91 to 8.96) and lichenified onchodermatitis which exhibited the strongest association (OR=8.11, 95% CI: 4.42 to 14.87) (online supplemental file 10).
Perception and acceptability of CDTI
Interviews were conducted with 40 community members and 26 CDDs to understand perceptions around IVM (online supplemental file 11).
Exposure and awareness
Many community members understood that IVM (commonly referred to as ‘Mectizan’) was used to treat ‘filaria’ (common name for onchocerciasis) which was transmitted by ‘Mbitti’ (blackfly), and caused itching, skin disease, discolouration of the skin, skin nodules (‘mabo’ or ‘horns’), itching eyes and blindness. Most participants (of all ages) suggested that ‘filaria’ was very common in their communities. All participants reported getting bitten by flies (or mosquitoes) frequently and this was often associated with being near water or on their farm. Other beliefs about transmission included through intercourse or sharing clothes, with some rare reports that it was hereditary. Measures taken to prevent bites included; covering skin as much as possible, especially feet; use of medicated soap, improved hygiene and not sharing clothes.
‘It is because I always mask myself from my head, all my skin, except my neck that I do not cover’ (Community member, man aged 15 to 20 years).
Acceptance of CDTI
There were many structural, social, economic and health factors identified by the communities which contributed to adherence or non-adherence to IVM which are outlined in table 2.
The most prominent barriers and facilitators for CDTI were centred around acceptability, including affordability of taking IVM. CDDs reported that the acceptability of ‘Mectizan’ varied in households with some accepting and others not. The main driver identified by community members for taking ‘Mectizan’ was its perceived health benefits of reducing symptoms and treating ‘hidden disease’. Older adults (aged >40 years) were the most likely to recognise health benefits from taking ‘Mectizan’, which mostly included improvement in eyesight and reduction in blindness.
The main barrier to accepting ‘Mectizan’ for community members was fear of adverse events (online supplemental file 12). Even if community members perceived associated health benefits, for some this was over-ridden by fear of adverse events, such as swelling and increased itching, or fear of ‘provoking’ other sickness. Some had taken ‘Mectizan’ in the past and experienced a negative reaction and therefore would not accept it again, while others had heard of negative effects in the community and therefore would not take it at all. Fear around side effects of ‘Mectizan’ and associations with death were highlighted both by community members and CDDs. Fears of death were reported as ‘Mectizan’ was thought to make the conditions worse or provoke other diseases or activate malaria, typhoid, rheumatism and especially hernias. which were perceived to worsen when taking ‘Mectizan’. Several community members reported that they never participated in CDTI due to rumoured reports of deaths or observed side effects.
‘I have not been taking because I am afraid because some people say when they take, they get swollen and others die. So that has made me never to take mectizan, and I have never taken mectizan.’ (Male community member 31 to 40 years).
Fear of economic consequence of adverse events, such as needing treatment or missing work was given as a justification for not accepting ‘Mectizan’, particularly for those who worked on farms, especially around the cocoa season. An older man reported that ‘It disturbs them from going to the farm and carry out other personal, social and commercial activities’. (Community member, man, aged 60+ years).
Not having the money to pay for healthcare or treatment created fears that they could die from side effects if they took ‘Mectizan’.
Other social, economic and health consequences of adverse events was also noted by CDDs and community members (online supplemental file 12), such as fear of fertility problems or causing miscarriage, fear of hernias needing surgery as well as becoming a burden to the family by being unable to attend work or school, or being unable to socially interact due to adverse events, particularly itching or reduced mobility.
It makes me to feel uncomfortable when I want to sit with my friends… Because I cannot go and sit among my friends and be scratching my skin (Community member, man, aged 15 to 20).
Those that did accept ‘Mectizan’ may try to mitigate potential adverse events through changing how it was consumed, for example, it was reported that some community members would grind ‘Mectizan’ and add it to ‘rubbing oil’ therefore instead of ingesting the medication, it was applied directly to their skin. This was seen by a few to reduce the severity of adverse events.
After over 15 years of CDTI with ≥65% programmatic therapeutic coverage, we report O. volvulus prevalence as high as 44.4% in a sample of over 9000 individuals aged 5 years and above and living in 20 villages of South West Region, Cameroon.7 Only three villages were found to be hypoendemic, and prevalence was above 30% in all 20 communities.
CDTI has been an effective control measure
The low CMFL in all communities and its dramatic drop even in communities with very high pre-control indicators, show a strong impact of CDTI on infection intensity, similarly to other settings, and suggests that CDTI has been an effective control measure.7 10 17 Additionally, there was an overall low prevalence of late onset OSD mostly affecting older participants when compared with various pre-control studies.22–26 The reduction of severe morbidity was also perceived by community members, especially the older participants and CDDs who reported that they observed a reduction of blindness and severe skin disease since CDTI began.
Using the same OSD classification, pre-control data and current OSD estimates in the Kumba district, the prevalence of nodules, depigmentation, early onset skin disease and severe itching were found to be 46%, 29.8%, 21.7, % and 21.4% in the late 90s and dropped to 17%, 3.4%, 5.4% and 5.8%, respectively, in 2017.18 22 Reduction in OSD and severe itching prevalence following several years of CDTI has also been reported in African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC) sentinel sites, with declining rates varying with therapeutic coverage.3 24 27 IVM treatment within a year before the study was associated with lower infection levels as well as with lower odds of having nodules, the latter possibly reflecting the partial macrofilaricidal activity of repeated doses.28
Adherence was associated with lower infection levels in participants aged ≥15 years only, and increased participation resulted in increased protective effect of treatment, reflecting the impact of long-term ivermectin uptake.2 29
Effectiveness is suboptimal and CDTI alone is unlikely to achieve elimination in this setting
In addition to high onchocerciasis prevalence, over one-third (35.8%) of adults and 15.9% of children born in the CDTI era had nodules and/or suffered from OSD and/or severe itching, indicating a suboptimal impact of treatment and persisting transmission.10 The prevalence of early onset skin disease (acute or chronic papular onchodermatitis) was similar in participants aged below or above 15 years.
Challenge 1: transmission and exposure
Children (age <15 years, that is, born in the ‘CDTI era’) had overall similar mf prevalence and mf loads as participants aged ≥15 years. Low or absent infection levels in young children would be supportive of a decrease or block in transmission following implementation of CDTI, but this pattern was not supported by our findings. The only group with significantly lower infection levels than adults were children aged 5 to 8 years who never took ivermectin. While the absence of association between treatment and infection levels in children could be due to reporting bias, we found that systematic non-adherence was highest in this age group (52.6%), probably because children aged 5 to 6 years might not have yet participated into CDTI due to their age versus distribution timing. This high reported non-participation would be in favour of accurate reports, even more so since children were assisted by their parents in answering questionnaires. Additionally, children aged 5 to 8 years identified as high adherers were more likely to exhibit OSD symptoms than others, suggesting that the presence of symptoms might have led parents to give them treatment. This result would be in line with the assessment of association (which go both ways) and not causality.
As a comparison, reported systematic non-adherence by older children aged 9 to 14 years was much lower (21.6%) and might more likely result from response bias due to social desirability. This absence of association between ivermectin uptake and infection levels in participants aged less than 15 years has previously been reported in the area and has been attributed to response bias as children tend to give answers that they think are expected from them.30 31 Yet, this bias might have been mitigated by parents assisting children up to 15 years in answering questions. Another reason, suggesting high transmission in the area, could be behaviour favouring exposure of children and adolescents, as previously reported in Cameroon.7 32
In participants aged over 15 years, self-reported adherence to CDTI was associated with decreased incidence of skin infection. Yet, our fully adjusted models estimated that the lowest prevalence rates remained at over 25%, among older adults with high adherence. High prevalence rates in high adherers might relate to the local high transmission potential. Although this will need to be corroborated by entomological studies, blackfly biting rates appeared high as community members reported frequent bites on their farms or while at the river for social or domestic activities. The Meme River basin was previously found to have the highest entomological indices in the area, with over 1000 infective larvae/man/month in some communities.7 Participants lived and worked extremely close to the rivers and attempts to prevent exposure through clothing was often insufficient in preventing bites. Our results indicate that the CDTI strategy had suboptimal impact in suppressing skin infections to prevent transmission in both children and adults although with contrasting self-reported adherence patterns. A second factor contributing to persistent high prevalence could be the selection of O. volvulus more refractory to ivermectin occurring in areas with higher drug pressure due to long-term CDTI, which has previously been documented in Cameroon and Ghana.33–35
Model-based treatment duration requirements for breaking transmission in hyperendemic settings with annual CDTI at coverage above 65% range between 10 years (for a 62% pre-control prevalence) and >25 years.6 The comparison of pre-control and current estimates for one-third of our study villages indicate that they are far below the more optimistic targets, with only one being within model-based prediction ranges and current estimates being more in line with elimination not occurring even after 25 years of CDTI.6
Challenge 2: adherence
Adherence was particularly low in our study setting. Only half (52.8%) of adults participated in CDTI the year preceding the study, and as few as 5.7% reported having participated in at least 12 of 16 (ie, ≥75%) CDTI rounds (high adherers). We also found that adherence was lowest in adolescents and young adults (aged 15 to 29), which is in line with findings from West Cameroon.9 In the present study, low participation of the youth was mostly due to a lack of perceived need based on an absence or lack of awareness regarding associated morbidities such as chronic skin and ocular disease. While perceived health benefits or seriousness of disease have been reported as an important driver of adherence in Cameroon and Nigeria, in some settings, consequences of adverse events outweighed perceived health benefits.14 36 Lower perceived benefits in the young might lead to decreasing adherence in further rounds, both by this generation and their children in settings where morbidity declined due to successful control of onchocerciasis.9 37 38
Systematic non-adherence, 17.6% among adults, was extremely high, even compared with other areas of Cameroon, and is of major concern as model-based predictions suggest that elimination cannot be achieved in originally hyperendemic communities with 5% of systematic non-adherence.9 14 29 Reasons for suboptimal uptake of CDTI are variable and include systemic as well as individual factors.8 9 14 15 39 Programmatic factors associated with low adherence in this setting included limited access and availability of CDTI due to the timing and seasonality of distribution, which is in line with other findings in West Cameroon.9 However, the recommended strategy of biannual or pluriannual CDTI in areas of low adherence would unlikely overcome adherence issues in this setting, as acceptability of IVM treatment appeared to be the main driver of (non-)adherence.
An important finding is that the nature of adverse events reported as reasons for interrupted participation (low adherence) and systematic non-adherence were different. Low adherence appeared to relate to the fear of common and non-serious ivermectin-related AEs interfering with daily activities, a cause of low adherence that has been reported by many studies, including in Cameroon.9 37 We also found that an important deterrent to participation was the fear around the economic consequences of AEs, including treatment affordability, work incapacity and subsequent loss of income and difficulties in accessing health facilities. With recognition that onchocerciasis affects the world’s poorest and marginalised people the economic consequences of adverse events from IVM may continue to perpetuate poverty, and therefore should not be overlooked.40
Systematic non-adherence appeared to be associated to the fear of rumoured reports of deaths or observed adverse events (ie, not personally experienced), which are likely linked to SAEs that occurred in regions of L. loa co-endemicity, which is the case in South-West Cameroon.13 41 42 The fear of adverse events is a common reason for low adherence to CDTI in areas of loiasis co-endemicity and recommendations to tackle this issue include; lengthy communication strategies with communities, rapid epidemiological assessments, materials development, training, advocacy, community sensitisation and mobilisation, case management and counselling, supervision, monitoring and evaluation.41 Additionally, in areas where the population associates ivermectin-related SAEs and deaths with loiasis, the use of the LoaScope-based Test and Not Treat strategy to identify and exclude from treatment L. loa cases at risk for SAEs might help increase adherence.43
Yet, our findings suggest that none of those solutions might help overcome low adherence to CDTI and achieve elimination in this area. First, the Test and Not Treat strategy might not help reassuring the population as it would not lead to the exclusion of any individuals in these communities due to the current low intensity of loiasis in this region.44 45 Importantly, while participants reported fear of SAEs (and death) that are known to be related to ivermectin treatment in case of heavy infection with loiasis, they did not directly associate them with loiasis. Rather, they associated those SAEs with witchcraft, or as revealing severe diseases previously ‘hidden’ in the body such as malaria, typhoid or hernias. Therefore, it appears unlikely that CDTI adaptive measures would overcome deeply anchored fears and beliefs partly relating to historical memory of SAEs in this area with a history of low-to-moderate endemicity.45 This persistence of the fear of SAEs and death in areas where the actual risk of ivermectin SAEs is virtually non-existent, could be a major obstacle to onchocerciasis elimination. Indeed, it might also affect populations who are not directly at risk for SAEs but live in settings where historical memories of SAEs and deaths have been perpetuated including when originating from other communities. This issue should not be overlooked as it might affect up to 79 million persons living in the areas of currently low-to-moderate loiasis risk within the 11 APOC countries.45
Our study has several limitations. First, the low enrolment rate, a common issue with skin snipping, likely resulted in an underestimation of our infection and morbidity estimates as low or non-adherers, who are also more likely to be infected and suffer from OSD, might be less inclined to participate in studies.46 Yet estimates produced by regression models were adjusted for imbalanced characteristics due to non-participation and therefore unbiassed. Second, the cross-sectional design of this work cannot infer causality and longitudinal studies are needed to adequately quantify the impact of adherence to CDTI on infection levels and morbidity. Third, adherence to CDTI was assessed through self-reporting, which is known to be subject to recall bias. Still, some studies have established that most CDTI participants (>60%) are able to correctly recall their number of treatment and comparisons have indicated that reported coverage is overall similar to surveyed coverage.47 48 Although response bias from children is likely, the clear inverse relationship between self-reported adherence expressed in broad percentage categories and infection levels in adults suggests that the recollection of participation in CDTI over 15 annual rounds by adults was generally an accurate reflection of adherence. Additionally, systematic non-adherence is likely to be adequately reflected as it is not subject to memory recollection.9
CDTI is facing major issues to achieve elimination of onchocerciasis in this area of current very low, but past low-to-moderate loiasis co-endemicity. In those originally hyperendemic communities located close to breeding sites, onchocerciasis transmission is still high despite 15 rounds of CDTI, with high prevalence persisting among high adherers. Of particular concern is the extremely high systematic non-adherence, with over one in six adults reporting having never taken ivermectin. Despite the current very low prevalence of loiasis in the area, an important reason for systematic non-adherence was the fear of ivermectin-related SAEs or death which were historically reported in the region.42 Yet those SAEs were not perceived as associated with loiasis by community members. It therefore appears unlikely that CDTI alone will achieve elimination in areas where both parasites have long co-existed and deeply rooted negative perception of ivermectin persisted despite the quasi disappearance of high-risk levels of loiasis, even if access, community sensitisation and management of adverse events were to be improved. Other alternative approaches such as vector control with ground larviciding or treatment with doxycycline, a macrofilaricidal antibiotic that avoids adverse events due to the absence of direct microfilaricidal activity, might be more acceptable to these communities.49 Additionally, CDTI effectiveness might potentially be further impacted by the selection of O. volvulus that are less sensitive to IVM following long-term treatments. Alternative strategies are needed to tackle onchocerciasis in regions of persisting high prevalence and low CDTI adherence, particularly in areas of current but also past co-endemicity with loiasis.50–54
The authors wish to thank The Ministry of Public Health, Cameroon, South-West regional delegation of health, the district medical officers of Kumba and Konie, the chiefs of various health centres within the two health districts for their assistance and support during this field exercise. They would also like to thank the community heads and community health implementers for their support and inputs. Thanks also go to the populations of the study villages who willingly participated in this study and all those who helped in the execution of this study, particularly Mr Njato Isaac. We are thankful to Dr Caroline Jeffery for consulting on adjusting for non-participation and data imputation. This work has partially been presented at the British Society for Parasitology Spring Meeting 2019 and the 11th European Congress on Tropical Medicine and International Health.
AF and SW are joint first authors.
Handling editor Alberto L Garcia-Basteiro
Contributors SW, JDT, ST and MJT conceptualised the study. SW, JDT, ST and MJT acquired funding. SW, TMN, LH, ST, LD, KO, EGF and DBN contributed to the design of the qualitative study. SW, JDT, LH, AJN, RAA, ADO, EK, PCN and MJT contributed to the design of the quantitative parasitological study. SW, MEM, LH, JDT and MJT contributed to the design of the clinical assessments. EDO, AJN, RE, WPCN, RAA, AA, EME, BN, DAN, STe, EK, PE and LH collected the quantitative data. TMN, EGF and DBN collected the qualitative data. STe, AS and EEA conducted the clinical assessments.TMN, EGF, DBN, HP and KO analysed and interpreted the qualitative data. AF analysed and interpreted the quantitative data. AF, HP, KO wrote the first draft. All authors contributed to the second draft. All the authors approved the final manuscript.
Funding This study was funded by the Department for International Development (DFID), UK.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval This protocol was reviewed and approved by the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Research Ethics Committee (reference: 16–027), the Cameroonian National Ethics Committee for Research on Human Health (approval no. 2016/11/838/CE/CNERSH/SP) and the Division of Health Operations Research within the Cameroonian Ministry of Public Health (approval no. 631–03.17).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement Data are available upon request. The data sets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Twitter Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases @CNTD_LSTM
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.