Introduction Early access to adequate antenatal care (ANC) from skilled providers is crucial for detecting and preventing obstetric complications of pregnancy. We aimed to assess factors associated with the utilisation of the new WHO ANC guidelines including the recommended number, on time initiation and adequate components of ANC contacts in Myanmar.
Methods We examined data from 2943 mothers aged 15–49 years whose most recent birth occurred in the last 5 years prior to the 2015–2016 Myanmar Demographic and Health Survey. Factors associated with utilisation of the new WHO recommended ANC were explored using multinomial logistic regression and multivariate models. We used marginal standardisation methods to estimate the predicted probabilities of the factors significantly associated with the three measures of ANC.
Results Approximately 18% of mothers met the new WHO recommended number of eight ANC contacts. About 58% of the mothers received adequate ANC components, and 47% initiated ANC within the first trimester of pregnancy. The predicted model shows that Myanmar could achieve 70% coverage of adequate components of ANC if all women were living in urban areas. Similarly, if ANC was through private health facilities, 63% would achieve adequate components of ANC. Pregnant women from urban areas (adjusted risk ratio (aRR): 4.86, 95% CI 2.44 to 9.68) were more than four times more likely to have adequate ANC components compared with women from rural areas. Pregnant women in the highest wealth quintile were three times more likely to receive eight or more ANC contacts (aRR: 3.20, 95% CI 1.61 to 6.36) relative to mothers from the lowest wealth quintile. On time initiation of the first ANC contact was fourfold for mothers aged 30–39 years relative to adolescent mothers (aRR: 4.07, 95% CI 1.53 to 10.84).
Conclusion The 2016 WHO ANC target is not yet being met by the majority of women in Myanmar. Our results highlight the need to address health access inequity for women who are from lower socioeconomic groups, or are younger, and those living in rural areas.
- maternal health
- child health
- health systems
- cross-sectional survey
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
What is already known?
Pregnant women in the lower socioeconomic strata are known to be at higher risk for not initiating adequate ANC early and not receiving at least four ANC visits.
What are the new findings?
We demonstrate that Myanmar could achieve 63% coverage of adequate ANC components if the minimum ANC standards were available from the public health facilities at the same rate as those of private health facilities.
Also, if women in rural areas had the same access to ANC as women in urban areas, the country would achieve 70% coverage for adequate components of ANC.
What do the new findings imply?
Efforts to prioritise capacity, including infrastructure and resourcing in rural public health facilities, will improve ANC quality and equity for pregnant women from lower socioeconomic groups and those living in rural areas.
Despite global efforts to expand the coverage of maternal and child healthcare services, most women in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) still experience a high-risk of death related to pregnancy and childbirth.1 2 Coverage of essential healthcare services such as adequate ANC and skilled birth attendance are among the key indicators to track progress of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).3 4 SDG-3 aims to reduce maternal mortality to less than 70 per 100 000 live births and neonatal mortality to less than 12 per 1000 live births by 2030.5 Early access to adequate ANC services from skilled providers is crucial to ensure the best care for women, including promoting awareness, detection and prevention of complications during pregnancy, labour and the postnatal period and to avoid stillbirths and newborn deaths.6–8 Although in 2017 an estimated 62% of women globally received four ANC contacts with skilled health providers,9 the quality of care provided, the skill level of the healthcare provider and early initiation of the first contact remains low and hinders improving health outcomes for women and her offspring.10 11
In 2010, a Cochrane systematic review of randomised trials in Thailand, Cuba, Saudi Arabia and Argentina found a borderline significant increase in perinatal mortality for women randomised to four ANC visits compared with eight model of care.12 13 Based on the recommendation, in 2016, the WHO released the new ANC guidelines for routine ANC to complement the existing WHO guidelines released since 2000 on the management of pregnancy-related complications. The new WHO guidelines recommend eight standard ANC contacts, which previously was only four focus ANC visits.14 As well as increasing the number of contacts, the new guideline aims to provide pregnant women with respectful, individualised, person-centred care at every ANC contact.15 This is a major shift in focus that puts pregnant women at the centre of care. It also emphasises that the first ANC contact should be initiated during the first trimester at <12 weeks gestational age.15 Furthermore, the guideline highlighted the importance of quality of care provided to pregnant women at each ANC contact.16
In 2015, Myanmar was among the Southeast Asian countries with the highest maternal mortality, estimated at 178 per 100 000 live births.2 Postpartum haemorrhage (31%), eclampsia (11%) and abortion-related complications (10%) were the leading cause of maternal mortality in the country.17 Improving the quality and accessibility of maternal and child healthcare services is a priority of the government of Myanmar, as outlined in the Myanmar National Health Plan 2017–2021.18 Previous research investigating ANC in Myanmar has identified factors associated with utilisation and access to care during pregnancy,19–21 birth and postbirth22 23 and highlighted the need to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care services.24 However, these studies did not investigate the new WHO recommended ANC guidelines. In 2018, the Myanmar Ministry of Health and Sports issued a national guideline for ANC based on the 2016 WHO guideline for delivery of ANC services.25 The goal of the national guideline for ANC was to enable service providers at all levels of the health system to use evidence-based knowledge and skills to deliver quality ANC services. In line with the new WHO standard guidelines, this study aims to assess the factors associated with the recommended initiation, number of contacts and adequate components of ANC in order to inform policy and health services of their capacity and compliance with the WHO recommended standard ANC.
We examined data from the 2015–2016 Myanmar Demographic and Health Survey (MDHS), which is a stratified national-level household survey conducted in seven states and eight regions of Myanmar.26 The 2015–2016 MDHS is the first ever Demographic and Health Survey conducted by the Myanmar Ministry of Health and Sports and funded by the US Agency for International Development. A two-stage stratified sampling design was conducted for the selection of the sample in urban and rural areas and for each of the seven states and eight regions of Myanmar. The first stage involved selecting sample points (clusters) consisting of enumeration areas or ward/village tracts with a total of 442 clusters (123 urban and 319 rural). At the second stage, equal probability systematic sampling was used for selection of a fixed number of 30 households from each of the selected clusters. Detailed information of the 2015–2016 MDHS sampling design have been reported elsewhere.26 The survey collected information on access and utilisation of ANC services based on the focused ANC model, which recommended four ANC contacts. During the survey, women were asked about their access to ANC during pregnancy, such as a number of contacts, initiation and the components of ANC they received. The relevant information on ANC services were obtained from 3176 (2943 weighted) women aged 15–49 years who had ANC contacts from skilled providers during pregnancy for their most recent birth in the 5 years prior to the survey. We included only the most recent birth because these births had the most detailed information on maternal and child healthcare services and are less subject to recall bias. We also excluded 460 (13%) of mothers who did not receive any ANC and 180 (5%) of those mothers who had ANC from unskilled providers.
There are three study outcomes for this analysis that assess the new WHO standard ANC guidelines using the 2015–2016 MDHS dataset. The first study outcome was the recommended initiation of the first ANC contact expressed as the number of women with a live birth in the last 5 years prior to the survey who initiated their first ANC contact during the first trimester of pregnancy from skilled providers. We categorised ANC initiation as: (1) on-time initiation (defined as the number of pregnant women who initiated the first ANC contact during the first trimester ≤3 months); (2) late initiation (defined as those pregnant women who initiated their first ANC contact during the second trimester 4–6 months); and (3) very late initiation (defined as the number of pregnant women who initiated their first ANC contact during the third trimester 7–9 months); month is the unit of measurement in the Demographic and Health Survey. The second outcome was the new recommended number of ANC contacts defined as the number of women with a live birth in the 5 years prior to the survey who have had at least eight or more ANC contacts from skilled providers during pregnancy. We defined the number of ANC contacts as: (1) number of pregnant women who had 1–3 ANC contacts, (2) number of pregnant women with 4–7 ANC contacts and (3) number of pregnant women with eight or more ANC contacts. The third outcome was adequacy of ANC. It is expressed as the number of women with a live birth in the last 5 years prior to the survey who received adequate components of ANC from skilled providers during pregnancy. In this analysis, we included only seven components of ANC. These components were available from the list of the indicators collected during 2015–2016 MDHS such as blood pressure measurement, urine analysis, blood analysis, tetanus vaccination, iron supplementation, intestinal parasite medication and counselling on potential complications of pregnancy. Women receiving ANC components were categorised into: (1) adequate ANC (classified as the number of women who received between six and seven ANC components); (2) inadequate ANC (classified as the number of women who received between four and five ANC components); and (3) severely inadequate ANC (classified as the number of women who received less than four ANC components).
Explanatory variables for this analysis were selected based on the literature27–29 and included household characteristics; cluster type and location (representing the characteristics of a cluster); and the household wealth quintile (representing the economic status of the household). The maternal and partner factors (describing individual-level circumstances of a pregnant woman and of her partner) included maternal characteristics such as mother’s current age, mother’s education, mother’s working status, and partner characteristics such as husband’s working status, and education.30 31 We also, included exposure to mass media, including radio, television, newspapers or magazines,32 and birth rank, birth interval, place of ANC services, place of birth, mode of birth, type of birth assistance and postnatal care services.33 34
All analyses were carried out using STATA/MP V.12.35 The ‘Svy’ survey commands were used to allow for adjustments for the cluster sampling design and sampling weights. The frequency tabulations were generated to describe the characteristics of study variables.35 Since each of the outcome variables had more than two categories, we conducted univariable multinomial logistic regressions to determine the unadjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for the outcome variables. This was followed by conducting multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis to examine risk ratios for factors associated with each of the outcomes. At the initial stage, we included all the predictor variables, with (p<0.2). This was followed by a manual backward procedure to eliminate non-significant variables but retaining those significant (p<0.05) factors. The final model included all the variables with p<0.05.
To estimate the predicted probabilities of the factors significantly associated with the outcomes, we used marginal standardisation methods describe by Muller and MacLehose.36 According to this method, the estimated odds of outcome is proportionally adjusted according to a weight for each level of the covariates following confounder-adjusted logistic regression. The following formula was used to examine the marginal standardisation:
Whereas (pΛez) is the predicted probabilities of the study outcome for any (E=e and Z=z) assuming that all respondents (target population) in the dataset had the single set values of the exposure level donated to Set[E=e] and with the same distribution of a given set of observed values for the covariate vector donated to (Z=z). Thus, the logistic regression coefficients were used to calculate predicted probabilities for every respondent at their observed covariate pattern and newly exposure value. The marginal probabilities obtained from this method indicate a weighted average over the distribution of the covariates, which are equivalent to estimates obtained by standardising to the total population. In this analysis, we used the STATA margins command to compute the predicted probability of the factors associated with on time initiation of first ANC contact, receiving the recommended number of eight or more ANC contacts and receiving adequate ANC components after performing a logistic regression model.
Ethical approval consent
Verbal informed consent was taken from each respondent before the interview. The Demographic Health Survey programme gave permission to access and use the data for this research.
Patient and public involvement statement
This study is based on the analysis of secondary data of the 2015–2016 MDHS, which is available in the public domain. The participants were not involved in the design or implementation of this analysis, and there are no plans to disseminate the results of the analysis to study participants due to the deidentified data.
We found 59% (95% CI 56.0% to 62.5%) of mothers met the previous WHO guidelines for the minimum recommended number of 4 or more ANC contacts, of those mothers 42% (95% CI 39.0% to 44.1%) had a minimum number of 4–7 ANC contacts and 18% (95% CI 15.6% to 20.2%) had received the new recommended number of eight or more ANC contacts. About 58% (95% CI 55.1% to 61.2%) of mothers had an adequate number of ANC components. ANC contact was initiated within the first trimester of pregnancy by 47% of women (95% CI 41.1% to 49.5%) (figure 1).
Almost three quarters (73%) of the study population lived in a rural area and 23% of the study population were in the lowest wealth quintiles. Three per cent of mothers were adolescents (<20 years). Public health facilities were the main ANC service providers, accounting for 71% of ANC. About half (53%) of all live births were in non-health facilities, and almost a quarter of all births (23%) were attended by unskilled providers (table 1).
Mothers aged 20–29 years (aRR: 2.85, 95% CI 1.07% to 7.58%), 30–39 years (aRR: 4.07, 95% CI 1.53% to 10.84%) and 40–49 years (aRR: 3.79, 95% CI 1.29% to 11.11%) were at least twofold more likely to initiate ANC during the first trimester of pregnancy relative to adolescent mothers. Mothers assisted by skilled healthcare providers at birth were twofold more likely to have initiated ANC in the first trimester than mothers unassisted at birth or assisted by unskilled healthcare providers (aRR: 2.34, 95% CI 1.45% to 3.77%, table 2).
Urban women were more than fourfold more likely to receive an adequate number of ANC components compared with rural women (aRR: 4.86, 95% CI 2.44 to 9.68). Pregnant women attending private facilities for ANC (aRR: 2.24, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.42) and those attending public facilities for ANC (aRR: 2.37, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.65) were twice more likely to have adequate components of ANC compared with their counterparts who received ANC from home/other informal source (table 3).
Pregnant women in the highest wealth quintile were threefold more likely of having eight and more ANC contacts (aRR: 3.20, 95% CI 1.61 to 6.36) relative to mothers from the lowest wealth quintile. Mothers who gave birth in a health facility were twofold more likely to have received eight or more ANC contacts (aRR: 2.35, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.28) compared with those mothers who gave birth in non-health facility. Receiving eight or more ANC contacts was threefold more likely for women attending a private facility for ANC (aRR: 3.62, 95% CI 1.86 to 6.97), compared with home/other informal sources of ANC (table 4).
In the predictive model keeping the distribution of all covariates the same, except making urban residence universal, we would expect 70% of women to receive an adequate number of components of ANC during their pregnancy (online supplementary file 1). Alternatively, if all women received ANC from private healthcare facilities keeping all other covariates unchanged, 63% would receive the adequate number of ANC components (online supplementary file 1). Similarly applying the same methods but all women were aged between 15 years and 19 years, we would expect that 30% of women would initiate the first ANC contact during the first trimester of pregnancy. Whereas if all women were 20–29 years, this would be increased to 46% of women initiating the first ANC contact during the first trimester of pregnancy (online supplementary file 2). The best model for the predictive margins for the recommended number of eight ANC contacts were as high as 27% for pregnant women receiving ANC from a private health facility (online supplementary file 3).
Our results demonstrate that Myanmar is similar to many other LMICs, with 59% of the pregnant women meeting the previous WHO minimum number of four or more ANC contacts, compared with the global LMIC proportion of 55%.1 37 We found that about 18% of pregnant women in Myanmar met the new recommended number of eight or more ANC contacts. Less than half of women initiated ANC by 12 weeks gestational age as recommended by WHO.14 Our estimate of the likelihood of pregnant women receiving the recommended number, adequacy and on time initiation of ANC contacts was significantly higher for urban residents, women aged between 20 years and 49 years and women from the wealthiest households. Our findings highlight that Myanmar has made slow progress over the period of the Millennium Development Goals era with regards to coverage of the new focus ANC model. This needs to be considered in the context of the civil unrest, internal conflicts and of course that the ANC model in place was based on the previous WHO ANC module.38 We also found that there remains inequity in ANC utilisation.
Socioeconomic inequality in ANC contacts exists in Myanmar, as it does in almost all countries around the world.24 28 39 40 In this study, pregnant women in the lower socioeconomic strata were at a higher risk for not initiating ANC early, not receiving the recommended number of ANC contacts or receiving adequate ANC components. We demonstrated that Myanmar could achieve ~51% coverage of up to seven ANC contacts, if all women were in the highest wealth quintile households. Evidence of improving access to ANC has included cash transfer schemes, housing finance schemes and community mortgage programmes for low-income women.41 Such initiatives benefit poorer women by improving their living conditions and status within the household through providing them with access to capital, resources, credit, land, technology and information.42 43 Thus, intervening with similar programmes are likely to benefit women to access ANC, and these interventions may be worth considering for Myanmar.
Pregnant women who received the adequate number of components and recommended number of eight ANC contacts were more likely to use skilled healthcare providers at birth and postbirth care services than women who did not. Late initiation of ANC precludes sufficient time to access the sufficient number of ANC contacts thus missing opportunities for early intervention, and this has been previously identified.44–46 In other settings such as South-eastern Tanzania and Afghanistan, a counselling intervention of early ANC initiation that involved training community health volunteers to provide ANC information to women within their own communities has been shown to improve on-time initiation of ANC.47 48
Urban residence was predictive of women receiving adequate ANC components, consistent with a previous study in 91 LMICs.49 In Myanmar, inadequate ANC components could be explained by poor healthcare infrastructure particularly in rural areas. Our findings demonstrate that, if the minimum standards of ANC components such as diagnostic tests were available from the public health facilities at the same rate as those of private health facilities, the country would achieve 63% coverage of adequate components of ANC. In addition to our findings, a lack of availability and distribution of health resources such as a sufficient supply chain, financial resources and infrastructure particularly in rural and hard-to-reach conflict and postconflict areas are among the challenges facing the health system as indicated in the Myanmar National Health Plan 2017–2021.50 Thus, building capacity, infrastructure and resourcing public health facilities in rural areas needs to be prioritised.50–52
In Myanmar, the risk of late initiation of ANC was higher among adolescent mothers. These adolescent mothers were generally primiparous, living in poorer and rural households. As in many LMICs, late initiation of ANC could be explained by the inability of pregnant adolescents to recognise the signs and symptoms of pregnancy, or trying to conceal their pregnancies, leading to delays in initiating antenatal care.21 53 54 Adolescent pregnancy has poorer outcomes thus, an intervention that promotes delayed childbirth for married adolescents and more broadly promotes the use of contraception for adolescents could effectively reduce the risk of adolescent pregnancy and improve maternal and child health outcomes.
The study strengths include a representative national sample with a high response for women (96%). Data on birth history were restricted to the most recent birth in order to minimise recall bias. The study was however a cross-sectional survey that restricts the interpretation of causality. The reliance on maternal recall for the data is also a weakness; however, any bias is likely to be non-differential. Not all ANC service indicators, measurement and information on pregnancy, birth and postbirth complications or measurement of knowledge and attitude were collected during the 2015–16 MDHS, and this could have affected the result. However, these data are the best nationally representative data available from Myanmar.
Myanmar has made slow progress towards the previous WHO guidelines of four or more ANC contacts. The overall findings from this analysis show that the county is still far from attaining the new recommended number of eight and more ANC contacts. The main factors associated with on-time initiation, adequacy and recommended eight or more ANC contacts were urban residence, women aged between 20 years and 49 years and women from the wealthiest households. Interventions that address the persistent health access inequity for younger, poorer and rural women need to be prioritised in order for the country to improve access to recommended care throughout pregnancy and for a positive pregnancy experience thus improving maternal health and birth outcomes.
Handling editor Sanni Yaya
Contributors NSM and CR-G designed the study. NSM performed the analysis and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. CR-G revised drafts of the manuscript and provided advice on data analysis. KSM revised the manuscript and analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding CR-G is funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1127074 and a Robinson Fellowship, The University of Sydney. NSM is funded by SOAR funding, The University of Sydney.
Competing interests The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval The Ethics Review Committee on Medical Research, including Human Subjects in the Department of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports and ICF Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved the survey protocol.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement Data are available in a public, open access repository. Currently, the data are available from the Demographic and Health Surveys website (https://dhsprogram.com).
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.