You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 5, Issue 1
  • Does economic growth reduce childhood stunting? A multicountry analysis of 89 Demographic and Health Surveys in sub-Saharan Africa

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Original research
Does economic growth reduce childhood stunting? A multicountry analysis of 89 Demographic and Health Surveys in sub-Saharan Africa
  1. Sanni Yaya1,2,
  2. Olalekan A Uthman3,
  3. Michael Kunnuji4,
  4. Kannan Navaneetham5,
  5. Joshua O Akinyemi6,
  6. Rornald Muhumuza Kananura7,
  7. Visseho Adjiwanou8,
  8. Olatunji Adetokunboh9,
  9. Ghose Bishwajit1
  1. 1School of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  3. 3Warwick Centre for Applied Health Research and Delivery (WCAHRD), Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK
  4. 4Department of Sociology, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
  5. 5Department of Population Studies, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
  6. 6College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria
  7. 7Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
  8. 8Département de Sociologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
  9. 9The South African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sanni Yaya; sanni.yaya{at}uottawa.ca

Abstract

Background There is mixed evidence and lack of consensus on the impact of economic development on stunting, and likewise there is a dearth of empirical studies on this relationship in the case of sub-Saharan Africa. Thus, this paper examines whether economic growth is associated with childhood stunting in low-income and middle-income sub-Saharan African countries.

Methods We analysed data from 89 Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 1987 and 2016 available as of October 2018 using multivariable multilevel logistic regression models to show the association between gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and stunting. We adjusted the models for child’s age, survey year, child’s sex, birth order and country random effect, and presented adjusted and unadjusted ORs.

Results We included data from 490 526 children. We found that the prevalence of stunting decreased with increasing GDP per capita (correlation coefficient=−0.606, p<0.0001). In the unadjusted model for full sample, for every US$1000 increase in GDP per capita, the odds of stunting decreased by 23% (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.78). The magnitude of the association between GDP per capita and stunting was stronger among children in the richest quintile. After adjustment was made, the association was not significant among children from the poorest quintile. However, the magnitude of the association was more pronounced among children from low-income countries, such that, in the model adjusted for child’s age, survey year, child’s sex, birth order and country random effect, the association between GDP per capita and stunting remained statistically significant; for every US$1000 increase in GDP per capita, the odds of stunting decreased by 12% (OR=0.88, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.90).

Conclusion There was no significant association between economic growth and child nutritional status. The prevalence of stunting decreased with increasing GDP per capita. This was more pronounced among children from the richest quintile. The magnitude of the association was higher among children from low-income countries, suggesting that households in the poorest quintile were typically the least likely to benefit from economic gains. The findings could serve as a building block needed to modify current policy as per child nutrition-related programmes in Africa.

  • health policy
  • public health
  • stunting
  • cross-sectional survey
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002042

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Key questions

    What is already known?

    • Child health goals remain far from being met in most parts of sub-Saharan Africa.

    • Policymakers expect economic growth to influence child well-being positively.

    What are the new findings?

    • The prevalence of stunting decreases with increasing gross domestic product (GDP) per capita.

    • There is no significant association between GDP growth per capita and child stunting across sub-Saharan Africa.

    • Improved economic growth may positively affect the lives of children in wealthy households, but not of those from poor households.

    What do the new findings imply?

    • Improving child well-being requires clear policies that will ensure the most affected children have access to the resources needed.

    Background

    High rates of child mortality and undernutrition remain a persistent barrier to economic and human development goals in sub-Saharan African countries.1–8 Chronic undernutrition is a key predictor of child mortality and morbidity, both of which exert long-term consequences on cognitive development, as well as educational and professional outcomes, and lower the opportunities for upward mobility.9–12 As such, addressing child stunting is a critical aspect of Africa’s human development efforts in the post-millennium development goals (MDGs) era.13 14

    Researchers have shown that in many countries child mortality MDGs remain far from being met in sub-Saharan Africa, and risk factors such as inadequate healthcare infrastructure, lack of skilled human resources for healthcare and low use of reproductive and child health services are still widespread.5 15–19 Signs of great achievements are reported in the areas of fighting subsistence poverty, and improving access to better water and sanitation facilities, electricity, high school enrolment, and national and household food security, which are important preconditions for better child nutrition outcomes.15 20–23 Notwithstanding these achievements, sub-Saharan Africa and South Asian countries continue to account for most of the undernourished children worldwide, which in turn is contributing to the poor economic and human development outcomes.8 22

    During the last two decades, the relationship between economic growth and child nutrition has attracted noteworthy research and donor attention.24–30 Using a data set of 74 developing countries observed between 1984 and 2014, many concluded that economic growth is not a sufficient condition for child undernutrition reductions,31 while others suggested that factors that contributed the most to the decrease in child stunting are full immunisation, iron supplements and deworming medication.32 Economic growth can lead to widening inequalities in a variety of ways, such as access to education, health and technology, and growth represents an important means to reduce poverty only if income distribution remains constant over time.29 A most recent review of evidence on the association between stunting and undernutrition in childhood and economic outcomes in adulthood indicated that economic growth is effective at reducing stunting when ‘increases in national income are directed at improving the diets of children, addressing gender inequalities and strengthening the status of women, improving sanitation and reducing poverty and inequities’.33

    In the context of some developing countries, political reforms, influx of foreign aid and foreign direct investments are bringing unprecedented opportunities for growth, employment, education and improvement in public health indices.34–38 At the same time, significant challenges remain in an effort to sustain the growth trajectories, reduce the prevalence of extreme poverty, and cut child stunting and mortality rates. For sustaining the economic growth, challenges arise most notably from ineffective governance, endemic corruption, internal conflicts, high debt levels and poor resource management, which altogether downsize the impact of inadequate investment and intervention efforts to fight low child survival and anthropometric outcomes.39–42

    The challenges for improving child health are more pronounced in the resource-limited countries with chronic fiscal deficits, high dependence on foreign donors and low-performing agriculture sector. Poor agricultural resources with chronic water and energy crisis generally result in higher dependency on imported food and inflation in consumer prices, with diminishing food security among the poor households.13 43–47 The burden of stunting gets further compounded by the fast-changing demography, labour market and sociocultural environment. An increasing number of people are leaving the agricultural sector as they struggle for a better life and migrate to urban areas for better job and livelihood prospects.48–51 This increasing trend of rural-to-urban migration is causing serious imbalances in the labour force, increasing urban poverty and mounting pressure on the fragile healthcare infrastructure, exacerbating the situation of health and nutritional status of the urban population.52–55

    African age structure is predominantly young, meaning that each year an increasing number of people are enrolling in higher education and entering the job market without enough employment opportunities being created. Poor access to credit, market and technology also hinders the transition to high productivity jobs, and consequently a larger proportion of the youth remains stuck in low-productivity jobs.56–58 Low-income families face competing challenges between meeting basic needs such as food and housing and less immediate needs such as education and healthcare. This perpetuating cycle of poverty and stunting has been a key barrier to meeting most of the MDGs, and is most likely to remain so for the sustainable development goals as well, unless effective interventions (increased coverage of iron supplementation, immunisation, water, sanitation and hygiene, and social safety nets) are formulated and implemented.

    There is mixed evidence and lack of consensus on the impact of economic development on nutrition improvement, and there is a dearth of empirical studies on this relationship in the case of sub-Saharan Africa. In the present study, we used data from 89 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) in sub-Saharan Africa to assess the relationship between child nutritional status and economic development. The main rationale was to contribute to the current evidence base and assist in policymaking for child nutrition-related programmes in Africa.

    Methods

    Study design

    We used cross-sectional data from the DHS, which are nationally representative household surveys conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. This study used data from 89 DHS surveys conducted between 1987 and 2016 available as of October 2018. The DHS uses a multistage, stratified sampling design with households as the sampling unit.59 Eligible women and men living in households were interviewed. The survey data were comparable across countries as all survey instruments and procedures were implemented similarly.

    Outcome variable

    Childhood stunting and chronic childhood malnutrition were assessed using height-for-age according to WHO recommendations. We defined stunting as less than −2 SD for height-for-age z score (haz) according to the WHO international reference. The outliers were removed in line with the exclusion ranges recommended by WHO.60 Hence, haz <−6.0 and >+6 are excluded from the analysis.

    Main explanatory variable

    We used national aggregate data for gross domestic product (GDP) per capita from World Bank’s World Development Indicators (WDI). WDI provided data for GDP per capita, adjusted for purchasing power parity exchange rates. This adjustment makes the GDP per capita comparable across countries. Data from each respondent were merged with GDP per capita by country and survey year.

    Covariates

    The following covariates were included in the study: survey year, child’s age (0–11 months, 12–23 months, 24–48 months), child’s sex (male vs female), child’s birth order, household wealth index (poorest vs richest quintile),61 62 maternal educational attainment (no formal education vs secondary or higher education) and country income category (low-income vs lower-middle-income).

    Statistical analyses

    We used multivariable multilevel logistic regression models to analyse the association between stunting and GDP per capita. We specified a three-level model for binary response (stunted child or not), for a child (level 1), in a neighbourhood (level 2) living in a country (level 3). Two models were developed. First, the unadjusted model was with only GDP per capita as the only explanatory variable. The second model was adjusted for child’s age, survey year, child’s sex, birth order and country random effect.

    In addition to the analyses of the full sample, we also developed regression models for various subsamples: the poorest and richest wealth quintiles; children aged 0–11, 12–23 and 24–48 months; no formal education and secondary or higher education; and low-income and lower-middle-income. We reported the measures of association and ORs with their 95% CIs. Finally, Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine the association of (1) a country’s prevalence of stunting and GDP per capita and (2) the average annual change in the prevalence of stunting and the average annual change in GDP per capita. For correlation analysis, a country’s GDP per capita was log-transformed. Multilevel analysis was performed with the MLwiN V.3.02 software63 using Stata’s ‘runmlwin’.64 For all analyses, associations with a p value of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

    Patient and public involvement

    Patients and the public were not involved in the design and conduct of this research.

    Results

    Characteristics of the included surveys

    We included data from 89 surveys conducted between 1987 and 2016 in 20 sub-Saharan African countries with anthropometric data for 490 526 children. The characteristics of the included surveys are summarised in table 1. The total sample size ranged from 8065 in Cote D’Ivoire to 54 880 in Kenya. In recent surveys, the prevalence of stunting ranged from 19.2% in Ghana to 48.4% in Madagascar, and recent GDP per capita ranged from US$300 in Malawi to US$2997 in Nigeria. Of the 20 countries, 14 experienced decline in the average annual change in the prevalence of stunting, from as much as −12.1% in Ethiopia to as little as −0.3% in Cote D’Ivoire. Meanwhile, the remaining six countries experienced an increase in the average annual change in the prevalence of stunting, ranging from as much as 10.2% in Mali to as little as 0.1% in Burkina Faso. Nigeria and Ethiopia experienced the strongest economic growth with an average annual growth rate of GDP per capita of 87.6% and 83.6%, respectively, while Zimbabwe and Uganda experienced the weakest economic growth with an average annual growth rate of GDP per capita of 10.3% and 13.8%, respectively.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Summary characteristics of the surveys

    Association between economic growth and chronic childhood stunting

    The ecological association between GDP per capita and the prevalence of stunting is shown in figure 1. There was a strong statistically significantly negative correlation between GDP per capita and stunting rate, such that the prevalence of stunting decreased with increasing GDP per capita (correlation coefficient=−0.606, p<0.0001) (figure 1). There was a negative correlation between the average annual economic growth and the average annual change in the prevalence of stunting, although not statistically significant (correlation coefficient=−0.291, p=0.214) (figure 2).

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Association between gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and prevalence of stunting.

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Association between average annual change in gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and prevalence of stunting.

    Figure 3 shows the adjusted and unadjusted associations (ORs) between GDP per capita and stunting for the full sample and the different subsamples. In the unadjusted model for full sample, for every US$1000 increase in GDP per capita, the odds of stunting decreased by 23% (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.78). In the model adjusted for child’s age, survey year, child’s sex, birth order and country random effect, the association between GDP per capita and stunting remained statistically significant; for every US$1000 increase in GDP per capita, the odds of stunting decreased by 12% (OR=0.88, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.90).

    Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Unadjusted and adjusted associations between gross domestic product per capita and stunting.

    The magnitude of the association between GDP per capital and stunting was stronger among children in the richest quintile. After an adjustment was made, the association was not significant among children from the poorest quintile. The pattern of the associations across different age groups of children was similar to the full sample, and similarly for the different maternal educational groups. However, the magnitude of the association was more pronounced among children from low-income countries, such that, in the model adjusted for child’s age, survey year, child’s sex, birth order and country random effect, the association between GDP per capita and stunting remained statistically significant; for every US$1000 increase in GDP per capita, the odds of stunting decreased by 12% (OR=0.88, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.90).

    Discussion

    The study explored the association between economic growth and childhood stunting in 20 sub-Saharan African countries. Secondary data from DHS conducted between 1987 and 2016 were considered and used. The study involved 490 526 children who had anthropometric data. This multicountry analysis provided evidence for the complex association between economic growth and childhood stunting,65–67 and suggested that economic growth does not necessarily translate or lead to higher nutritional status of children in Africa. To make sense of this observation, we considered the argument that economic gains in many parts of Africa accrue disproportionately to the richest quintile.68 69 For this subpopulation, economic growth may have the desired effect of improving the welfare of children and other household members. Households in the poorest quintile are typically the least likely to benefit from economic gains, and are thus the least affected. In a sense, the study aligns with explanations from a few earlier studies.65–67 70–72

    For policy implementation and evaluation, a major implication is that macro-level economic growth indicators offer very little information about childhood stunting and general well-being, especially among the poorest, who also happen to be the most affected by negative health outcomes.73–75 Interventions designed with the assumption that economic growth translates to improved child well-being also run a high risk of being ineffective. Achieving the sustainable development goals depends on getting governments to address the gap between the rich and the poor, which is still at its highest level in decades.76

    The findings of this study will serve as a building block needed to modify current policy as per child nutrition-related programmes in Africa. Perhaps, the economic gains achieved accrue disproportionately to the rich, who are less affected by the problems of poor child well-being and health outcomes. Improving child well-being requires clear policies that will ensure the most affected children have access to the resources needed. At present, those benefiting from the economic gains are those with higher order needs. We recommend that low-income and middle-income countries of the world are encouraged to commit more to equitable distribution through social investment programmes that alleviate the poorest of the poor so that the poor–rich gap in childhood stunting can be bridged.

    Strengths and limitations

    The study involved a large sample from 89 surveys conducted in 20 countries to measure the association between economic growth and child nutritional status. The data were nationally representative; therefore, the findings were generalisable in the study area. There are various ways of assessing the nutritional status of children aged under 5 years, such as using clinical signs, biochemical indicators or anthropometry.77 The anthropometric approach is the most commonly used method/approach78 and is more advantageous when compared with the other two because it has the benefit of ease of interpretation, rapidity and objectivity. Stunting is regarded as an indicator of long-standing dietary inadequacy and can also be due to chronic infections. The height-for-age measure is less sensitive to temporary food shortages and thus is the most reliable indicator of long-standing malnutrition in childhood.79 Furthermore, the WHO recommended stunting as a reliable measure of overall social deprivation.78 However, DHS data have limitations. The surveys were cross-sectional and therefore associations but no causalities could be established. In addition, the surveys were conducted in different years. Therefore, results from different surveys should be compared with caution.

    Conclusions

    Economic growth does not necessarily improve the well-being of children in Africa. Perhaps, the economic gains achieved accrue disproportionately to the rich, who are less affected by problems of poor child well-being and health outcomes. Improving child well-being requires clear policies that will ensure the most affected children have access to the resources needed. At present, those benefiting from the economic gains are those with higher order needs.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank the MEASURE DHS project for their support and for free access to the original data.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Accorsi S,
      2. Fabiani M,
      3. Nattabi B, et al
      . The disease profile of poverty: morbidity and mortality in northern Uganda in the context of war, population displacement and HIV/AIDS. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg2005;99:226–33.doi:10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.09.008
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Adjiwanou V,
      2. LeGrand T
      . Gender inequality and the use of maternal healthcare services in rural sub-Saharan Africa. Health Place2014;29:67–78.doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.06.001
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Anele
      . Nigeria Has the Third Highest Infant Mortality Rate In The World – WHO [Internet]. Listwand, 2017. Available: http://listwand.com/2017/10/nigeria-has-the-third-highest-infant-mortality-rate-in-the-world-who/ [Accessed 24 Jan 2018].
    4. ↵
      1. Bishai DM,
      2. Cohen R,
      3. Alfonso YN, et al
      . Factors contributing to maternal and child mortality reductions in 146 low- and middle-income countries between 1990 and 2010. PLoS One2016;11:e0144908.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144908
    5. ↵
      1. Cha S
      . The impact of the worldwide Millennium Development Goals campaign on maternal and under-five child mortality reduction: ‘Where did the worldwide campaign work most effectively?’. Glob Health Action2017;10:1267961.doi:10.1080/16549716.2017.1267961
    6. ↵
      1. Ezeh O,
      2. Agho K,
      3. Dibley M, et al
      . The impact of water and sanitation on childhood mortality in Nigeria: evidence from demographic and health surveys, 2003–2013. Int J Environ Res Public Health2014;11:9256–72.doi:10.3390/ijerph110909256
      OpenUrl
    7. ↵
      1. Koblinsky M,
      2. Anwar I,
      3. Mridha MK, et al
      . Reducing maternal mortality and improving maternal health: Bangladesh and mdg 5. J Health Popul Nutr2008;26:280–94.doi:10.3329/jhpn.v26i3.1896
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Singh A
      . Why are economic growth and reductions in child undernutrition so weakly correlated--and what can public policy do?Lancet Glob Health2014;2:e185–6.doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70200-1
      OpenUrl
    9. ↵
      1. Cusick SE,
      2. Georgieff MK
      . The Role of Nutrition in Brain Development: The Golden Opportunity of the "First 1000 Days". J Pediatr2016;175:16–21.doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.05.013
      OpenUrlPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Fulhan J,
      2. Collier S,
      3. Duggan C
      . Update on pediatric nutrition: breastfeeding, infant nutrition, and growth. Curr Opin Pediatr2003;15:323–32.doi:10.1097/00008480-200306000-00017
      OpenUrlPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Kar BR,
      2. Rao SL,
      3. Chandramouli BA
      . Cognitive development in children with chronic protein energy malnutrition. Behav Brain Funct2008;4:31.doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-31
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Martins VJB,
      2. Toledo Florêncio TMM,
      3. Grillo LP, et al
      . Long-Lasting effects of undernutrition. Int J Environ Res Public Health2011;8:1817–46.doi:10.3390/ijerph8061817
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Bain LE,
      2. Awah PK,
      3. Geraldine N, et al
      . Malnutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: burden, causes and prospects. Pan Afr Med J2013;15:120.doi:10.11604/pamj.2013.15.120.2535
      OpenUrlPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Davies JI,
      2. Macnab AJ,
      3. Byass P, et al
      . Developmental origins of health and disease in Africa-influencing early life. Lancet Glob Health2018;6:e244–5.doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30036-6
      OpenUrl
    15. ↵
      1. Assefa Y,
      2. Damme WV,
      3. Williams OD, et al
      . Successes and challenges of the millennium development goals in Ethiopia: lessons for the sustainable development goals. BMJ Glob Health2017;2:e000318.doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000318
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      1. Cohen RL,
      2. Alfonso YN,
      3. Adam T, et al
      . Country progress towards the millennium development goals: adjusting for socioeconomic factors reveals greater progress and new challenges. Global Health2014;10.doi:10.1186/s12992-014-0067-7
    17. ↵
      1. English M,
      2. English R,
      3. English A
      . Millennium development goals progress: a perspective from sub-Saharan Africa. Arch Dis Child2015;100:S57–8.doi:10.1136/archdischild-2013-305747
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Lomazzi M,
      2. Borisch B,
      3. Laaser U
      . The millennium development goals: experiences, achievements and what's next. Glob Health Action2014;7:23695.doi:10.3402/gha.v7.23695
    19. ↵
      1. Ssewanyana S,
      2. Younger SD
      . Infant mortality in Uganda: determinants, trends and the millennium development goals. J Afr Econ2008;17:34–61.doi:10.1093/jae/ejm004
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    20. ↵
      1. Cha S,
      2. Mankadi PM,
      3. Elhag MS, et al
      . Trends of improved water and sanitation coverage around the globe between 1990 and 2010: inequality among countries and performance of official development assistance. Glob Health Action2017;10:1327170.doi:10.1080/16549716.2017.1327170
    21. ↵
      1. Institute of Medicine (US) Roundtable on Environmental Health Sciences
      . Achieving water and sanitation services for health in developing countries. National Academies Press (US), 2009.
    22. ↵
      1. Khan ZR,
      2. Midega CAO,
      3. Pittchar JO, et al
      . Achieving food security for one million sub-Saharan African poor through push-pull innovation by 2020. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci2014;369:20120284.doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0284
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Masipa TS
      . The impact of climate change on food security in South Africa: current realities and challenges ahead. Jàmbá2017;9.doi:10.4102/jamba.v9i1.411
    24. ↵
      1. Ali SS,
      2. Goudar S
      . The impact of nutrition on child development at 3 years in a rural community of India. Int J Prev Med2014;5:494–9.
      OpenUrl
    25. ↵
      1. Bershteyn A,
      2. Lyons HM,
      3. Sivam D, et al
      . Association between economic growth and early childhood nutrition. Lancet Glob Health2015;3:e79–80.
      OpenUrl
    26. ↵
      1. Biadgilign S,
      2. Shumetie A,
      3. Yesigat H
      . Does economic growth reduce childhood undernutrition in Ethiopia?PLoS One2016;11:e0160050.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160050
    27. ↵
      1. Hurley KM,
      2. Yousafzai AK,
      3. Lopez-Boo F, et al
      . Early child development and nutrition: a review of the benefits and challenges of implementing integrated interventions. Adv Nutr2016;7:357–63.doi:10.3945/an.115.010363
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    28. ↵
      1. Martorell R
      . The role of nutrition in economic development. Nutr Rev1996;54:S66–71.doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03900.x
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      1. McGovern ME,
      2. Krishna A,
      3. Aguayo VM, et al
      . A review of the evidence linking child stunting to economic outcomes. Int J Epidemiol2017;46:1171–91.doi:10.1093/ije/dyx017
      OpenUrl
    30. ↵
      1. Vollmer S,
      2. Harttgen K,
      3. Subramanyam MA, et al
      . Association between economic growth and early childhood nutrition-Authors’ reply. Lancet Glob Health2014;2:e501–2.
      OpenUrl
    31. ↵
      1. Mary S
      . How much does economic growth contribute to child stunting reductions?Economies2018;6:55.doi:10.3390/economies6040055
      OpenUrl
    32. ↵
      1. Buisman LR,
      2. Van de Poel E,
      3. O'Donnell O, et al
      . What explains the fall in child stunting in sub-Saharan Africa?SSM Popul Health2019;8:100384.doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100384
      OpenUrl
    33. ↵
      1. Beker V
      . Growth, Inequality and Poverty: What Do We Know?Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2727231 [Accessed 14 Nov 2019].
    34. ↵
      1. Alemu AM,
      2. Lee J-S
      . Foreign aid on economic growth in Africa: a comparison of low and middle-income countries. SAJEMS2015;18:449–62.doi:10.4102/sajems.v18i4.737
      OpenUrl
    35. ↵
      1. Bendavid E,
      2. Bhattacharya J
      . The relationship of health aid to population health improvements. JAMA Intern Med2014;174:881–7.
      OpenUrl
    36. ↵
      1. Riddell A,
      2. Niño-Zarazúa M
      . The effectiveness of foreign aid to education: what can be learned?Int J Educ Dev2016;48:23–36.
      OpenUrl
    37. ↵
      1. Shajalal M,
      2. Xu J,
      3. Jing J, et al
      . China's engagement with development assistance for health in Africa. Glob Health Res Policy2017;2:24.doi:10.1186/s41256-017-0045-8
      OpenUrl
    38. ↵
      1. Yogo TU
      . Assessing the effectiveness of foreign aid in the education sector in Africa: the case of primary education. Afr Dev Rev2017;29:389–402.doi:10.1111/1467-8268.12276
      OpenUrl
    39. ↵
      1. Fosu AK
      . Implications of the external Debt-servicing constraint for public health expenditure in sub-Saharan Africa. Oxford Dev Stud2008;36:363–77.doi:10.1080/13600810802455112
      OpenUrl
    40. ↵
      1. Mackey TK,
      2. Kohler JC,
      3. Savedoff WD, et al
      . The disease of corruption: views on how to fight corruption to advance 21st century global health goals. BMC Medicine2016;14:149.
    41. ↵
      1. Mostert S,
      2. Njuguna F,
      3. Olbara G, et al
      . Corruption in health-care systems and its effect on cancer care in Africa. Lancet Oncol2015;16:e394–404.doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00163-1
      OpenUrl
    42. ↵
      1. Rispel LC,
      2. de Jager P,
      3. Fonn S
      . Exploring corruption in the South African health sector. Health Policy Plan2016;31:239–49.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    43. ↵
      1. Akombi BJ,
      2. Agho KE,
      3. Merom D, et al
      . Child malnutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of demographic and health surveys (2006-2016). PLoS One2017;12:e0177338.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177338
    44. ↵
      1. Alemu ZA,
      2. Ahmed AA,
      3. Yalew AW, et al
      . Non random distribution of child undernutrition in Ethiopia: spatial analysis from the 2011 Ethiopia demographic and health survey. Int J Equity Health2016;15:198.doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0480-z
    45. ↵
      1. Belfort MB,
      2. Rifas-Shiman SL,
      3. Rich-Edwards JW, et al
      . Maternal iron intake and iron status during pregnancy and child blood pressure at age 3 years. Int J Epidemiol2008;37:301–8.doi:10.1093/ije/dyn002
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    46. ↵
      1. Chopra M,
      2. Darnton-Hill I
      . Responding to the crisis in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of nutrition. Public Health Nutr2006;9:544–50.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    47. ↵
      1. Webb P,
      2. Stordalen GA,
      3. Singh S, et al
      . Hunger and malnutrition in the 21st century. BMJ2018;361:k2238.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    48. ↵
      1. Buchanan P
      . Transport, land use and economics, 2016. Available: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/jurr/2016/00000009/00000002/art00006 [Accessed 27 Nov 2018].
    49. ↵
      1. Buckley RM,
      2. Simet L
      . An agenda for habitat III: urban perestroika. Environ Urban2016;28:64–76.doi:10.1177/0956247815622131
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    50. ↵
      1. Güneralp B,
      2. Lwasa S,
      3. Masundire H, et al
      . Urbanization in Africa: challenges and opportunities for conservation. Environ Res Lett2017;13:015002.doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa94fe
      OpenUrl
    51. ↵
      1. Turok I
      . Getting urbanization to work in Africa: the role of the urban land-infrastructure-finance nexus. Area Development and Policy2016;1:30–47.doi:10.1080/23792949.2016.1166444
      OpenUrl
    52. ↵
      1. Aliyu AA,
      2. Amadu L
      . Urbanization, cities, and health: the challenges to Nigeria – a review. Ann Afr Med2017;16:149–58.
      OpenUrl
    53. ↵
      1. Keiser J,
      2. SINGER BH,
      3. SMITH TA, et al
      . Urbanization in sub-Saharan Africa and implication for malaria control. 71. American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2004: 118–27. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK3775/doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2004.71.118
      OpenUrl
    54. ↵
      1. Oni T,
      2. Smit W,
      3. Matzopoulos R, et al
      . Urban health research in Africa: themes and priority research questions. J Urban Health2016;93:722–30.doi:10.1007/s11524-016-0050-0
      OpenUrl
    55. ↵
      1. Razak F,
      2. Berkman L
      . Urban development in sub-Saharan Africa: bearer of goods and risks. PLoS Med2014;11:e1001684.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001684
    56. ↵
      1. Collinson MA,
      2. White MJ,
      3. Ginsburg C, et al
      . Youth migration, livelihood prospects and demographic dividend: a comparison of the census 2011 and Agincourt health and demographic surveillance system in the rural northeast of South Africa. Etude Popul Afr2016;30:2629–39.doi:10.11564/30-2-852
      OpenUrl
    57. ↵
      1. Engelbrecht M,
      2. Shaw L,
      3. van Niekerk L
      . A literature review on work transitioning of youth with disabilities into competitive employment. Afr J Disabil2017;6:298.doi:10.4102/ajod.v6i0.298
      OpenUrl
    58. ↵
      1. Wilkinson A,
      2. Pettifor A,
      3. Rosenberg M, et al
      . The employment environment for youth in rural South Africa: a mixed-methods study. Dev South Afr2017;34:17–32.doi:10.1080/0376835X.2016.1259986
      OpenUrl
    59. ↵
      1. Rutstein SO,
      2. Rojas G
      . Guide to DHS statistics: demographic and health surveys methodology. Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro, 2006.
    60. ↵
      1. WHO
      . Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. technical report series No. 854. Geneva: WHO, 1995.
    61. ↵
      1. Montgomery MR,
      2. Gragnolati M,
      3. Burke KA, et al
      . Measuring living standards with proxy variables. Demography2000;37:155–74.doi:10.2307/2648118
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    62. ↵
      1. Vyas S,
      2. Kumaranayake L
      . Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan2006;21:459–68.doi:10.1093/heapol/czl029
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    63. ↵
      1. Rasbash J,
      2. Charlton C,
      3. Browne WJ
      . MLwiN Version 2.31. In: Centre for multilevel modelling. University of Bristol, 2014.
    64. ↵
      1. Leckie G,
      2. Charlton C
      . Runmlwin - A Program to Run the MLwiN Multilevel Modelling Software from within Stata. Journal of Statistical Software2013;52:1–40.
      OpenUrl
    65. ↵
      1. Alderman H,
      2. Hoogeveen H,
      3. Rossi M
      . Reducing child malnutrition in Tanzania. combined effects of income growth and program interventions. Econ Hum Biol2006;4:1–23.doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2005.07.001
      OpenUrlPubMed
    66. ↵
      1. Frijters P,
      2. Haisken-DeNew JP,
      3. Shields MA
      . The causal effect of income on health: evidence from German reunification. J Health Econ2005;24:997–1017.doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.01.004
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    67. ↵
      1. Heltberg R
      . Malnutrition, poverty, and economic growth. Health Econ2009;18:S77–88.doi:10.1002/hec.1462
      OpenUrl
    68. ↵
      1. Kai K
      . Globalization, financial depth, and inequality in sub-Saharan Africa. Economics Bulletin2009;29:2025–37.
      OpenUrl
    69. ↵
      1. Dreher A,
      2. Gaston N
      . Has globalization increased inequality?Rev Int Econ2008;16:516–36.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00743.x
      OpenUrl
    70. ↵
      1. Keeley B
      . Income inequality: the gap between rich and poor. Paris: OECD Insights, OECD Publishing, 2015.
    71. ↵
      1. Thoa NTM,
      2. Thanh NX,
      3. Chuc NTK, et al
      . The impact of economic growth on health care utilization: a longitudinal study in rural Vietnam. Int J Equity Health2013;12:19.doi:10.1186/1475-9276-12-19
    72. ↵
      1. De Silva I,
      2. Sumarto S
      . Does economic growth really benefit the poor? income distribution dynamics and Pro-poor growth in Indonesia. Bull Indones Econ Stud2014;50:227–42.doi:10.1080/00074918.2014.938405
      OpenUrl
    73. ↵
      1. Gwatkin DR
      . Health inequalities and the health of the poor: what do we know? what can we do?Bull World Health Organ2000;78:3–18.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    74. ↵
      1. Umuhoza SM,
      2. Ataguba JE
      . Inequalities in health and health risk factors in the southern African development community: evidence from World health surveys. Int J Equity Health2018;17:52.doi:10.1186/s12939-018-0762-8
    75. ↵
      1. van Doorslaer E,
      2. Wagstaff A,
      3. Bleichrodt H, et al
      . Income-Related inequalities in health: some international comparisons. J Health Econ1997;16:93–112.doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00532-2
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    76. ↵
      1. Yaya S,
      2. Ghose B
      . Global inequality in maternal health care service utilization: implications for sustainable development goals. Health Equity2019;3:145–54.doi:10.1089/heq.2018.0082
      OpenUrl
    77. ↵
      1. de Onis M,
      2. Frongillo EA,
      3. Blössner M
      . Is malnutrition declining? an analysis of changes in levels of child malnutrition since 1980. Bull World Health Organ2000;78:1222–33.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    78. ↵
      1. WHO Working Group
      . Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. who Working group. Bull World Health Organ1986;64:929–41.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    79. ↵
      1. Svedberg P
      . Undernutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: a critical assessment of the evidence. world Institute for development economics research, working paper No.15. Helsinki: UNU/WIDER, 1987.

    Footnotes

    • SY and OAU are joint first authors.

    • Handling editor Seye Abimbola

    • Contributors SY and OAU contributed to study design and conceptualisation. MK, NK, JOA, RMK and VA reviewed the literature. SY, OAU, OA and GB performed the analysis. All authors provided technical support and critically reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content. SY had the final responsibility to submit the manuscript for publication. All authors read and amended the drafts of the paper and approved the final version.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests SY is Associate editor of this journal.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Ethics approval Ethics approval was not required for this study since it used secondary data, which are available in the public domain. More details regarding DHS data and ethical standards are available at http://goo.gl/ny8T6X.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data availability statement Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data for this study were sourced from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and available at http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.