Article Text

Download PDFPDF

  1. Jacques Kaboré1,
  2. Hamidou Ilboudo2,
  3. Charlie FA Compaoré1,
  4. Oumou Camara2,
  5. Mohamed Bamba1,
  6. Hassane Sakandé1,
  7. Mamadou Camara2,
  8. Bruno Bucheton2,
  9. Dramane Kaba3,
  10. Vincent Jamonneau3,
  11. Stijn Deborggraeve4,
  12. Veerle Lejon5
  1. 1Centre International de Recherche-Développement sur l’Elevage en zone Subhumide, Bobo- Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
  2. 2Programme National de Lutte contre la THA, Guinea
  3. 3Institut Pierre Richet, Bouajem, Côte d’Ivoire
  4. 4Institut de Médecine Tropicale, Antwerp, Belgium
  5. 5Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Marseille, France


Background Human African trypanosomiasis, or sleeping sickness, remains a serious problem in tropical Africa. Timely diagnosis of this disease requires systematic population screening, particularly for Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, which has a long asymptomatic period.

The lack of sensitivity and specificity of conventional diagnostic tests has led in recent years to the use of molecular tools. Amplification of parasite-specific DNA sequences significantly improved diagnosis of infection. However, these molecular tools still have some limitations especially in the case of low parasitaemia. Furthermore, research is still needed to make molecular detection a real control tool for the fight against sleeping sickness. The purpose of this study is to determine the threshold of sensitivity of real-time PCR using the 18S and TgsGp primers and of the LAMP technique, applied in the DiTECT-HAT project as molecular reference tests.

Methods We used serial dilutions containing 0, 1, 10, 100, 103, 104, 105, 106 parasites per ml of blood. Samples were extracted, and DNA was amplified.

Results The analytical sensitivity of the 18S real-time PCR with the Taqman probe of the filter paper samples is 100 parasites/ml and that of the TgsGp real-time PCR with the Taqman probe of filter paper samples is 104 parasites/ml. For Lamp technique, the analytical sensitivity is 103 parasites/ml.

Conclusion This study shows that a ‘negative PCR’ would not mean ‘no parasite’. It suggests that DNA detection techniques should still be improved.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.