Article Text

Download PDFPDF

  1. Maria Rosário Oliveira Martins1,
  2. João Schwalbach2,
  3. Esperança Sevene2,3,
  4. Antonieta Martins4,
  5. Ema Candida Branco Fernandes5,
  6. Isabel Ines Araujo4,
  7. Helena Pereira De Melo6,
  8. Amilcar Bernardo Tome Da Silva5,
  9. Emanuel Catumbela5,
  10. Jahit Sacarlal3,
  11. Jorge Seixas1,
  12. Maria Chimpolo5,
  13. Rassul Nala2,
  14. Maria Tazi Nimi5,
  15. Amabelia Rodrigues7
  1. 1Global Health and Tropical Medicine Institute, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal
  2. 2Comité Nacional de Bioética para a Saúde de Moçambique
  3. 3Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique
  4. 4Universidade de Cabo Verde, Praia, Cape Verde
  5. 5Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Agostinho Neto, Comité Independente de Etica, Angola
  6. 6Faculdade de Direito, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Conselho de Ética da Universidade NOVA, Portugal
  7. 7Projeto Saúde Bandim, Statens Serum Institut, Guiné-Bissau


Background In 2017, a North-South partnership was created, to strengthen Bioethics Committees in African Lusophone African countries (LAC), by joining the forces of National and Institutional Research Ethics Committees (REC) and Universities in Angola, Cape Verde, Mozambique and Portugal. This study is part of an EDCTP2-funded project and aims to describe key RECs operating in LAC, its establishment dates and further characteristics.

Methods Document analysis and interviews with REC representatives of five LAC were conducted in April 2018. Legal documents were obtained through official national sources.

Results We identified four National Ethics Committees, created between 2000 and 2008 by ministerial or governmental decree; only S. Tomé e Principe does not have an established REC. In Angola, the National REC was created in 2000, and since 2007, seven Institutional Committees were implemented at faculty level. National REC in Cape Verde and Guinee-Bissau (CNES) are unique and were founded in 2007 and 2009 respectively. In Mozambique, National REC (CNBS) dates to 2002, and since 2011, 8 Institutional Committees were formed; they functioned as a network under the umbrella of CNBS. Most National REC have representatives from health professional associations, lawyers, civil society and religious communities and have regular meetings (usually monthly). The number of members ranges between 6 (CNES) and 13 (CNBS). In 2007, around 200 protocols were reviewed by CNBS and 29 by CNES. Most of the National REC members attended training activities in bioethics but at different levels.

Conclusion Few publications described REC operating in LAC; this study fills this gap by reporting historical and functional characteristics of RECs in five Lusophone African countries. Additional tools based on quantitative and qualitative approaches are being developed to assess more in-depth REC operational characteristics and to identify their needs in order to target training and capacity building initiatives underlying our project.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.