Article Text

Impact of United States political sanctions on international collaborations and research in Iran
  1. Fatemeh Kokabisaghi1,
  2. Andrew C Miller2,
  3. Farshid R Bashar3,
  4. Mahmood Salesi4,
  5. Ali A K Zarchi5,
  6. Abdalsamad Keramatfar6,
  7. Mohammad A Pourhoseingholi7,
  8. Hosein Amini8,
  9. Amir Vahedian-Azimi9
  1. 1 Healthcare and Law Department, School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2 Department of Emergency Medicine, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
  3. 3 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
  4. 4 Chemical Injuries Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6 Scientific Information Database, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7 Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8 Department of Epidemiology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  9. 9 Trauma Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  1. Correspondence to Dr Amir Vahedian-Azimi; Amirvahedian63{at}gmail.com

Abstract

International research collaborations improve individual, institutional and governmental capacities to respond to health crises and inequalities but may be greatly affected by political environments. Iran ranks highly in tertiary education, productivity growth, knowledge impact and successful patent applications. In many countries, economic hardship has correlated with increased international research collaborations. Some have hypothesised that financial constraint drives scholars to seek outside collaborations for cost and risk sharing, and to access funding, materials and patient populations otherwise unavailable. This paper explores the history and importance of US political sanctions on the health of Iran’s academic sector. Although Iran’s international research collaborations increased during periods of increased sanctions, the Pearson correlation coefficient between gross domestic product and international research collaborations was not significant (r=0.183, p=0.417). This indicates that other factors are at least in part responsible. Additionally, we found Iran’s quantitative (eg, publication number) and qualitative (eg, visibility indices) publishing metrics to be discordant (two-tailed Mann–Kendall trend; p<0.0002 for both). Reasons for this are multifactorial, including increased indexing of Iranian journals, willingness of lower visibility journals to handle manuscripts with Iranian authors, widespread linkage of career advancement to science visibility indices, and others. During periods of increased sanctions, Iranian scholars were increasingly denied opportunities to publish scientific findings, attend scientific meetings, access to essential medical and laboratory supplies and information resources. We conclude that academic boycotts violate researchers’ freedom and curtail progress. Free exchange of ideas irrespective of creed is needed to optimize global scientific progress.

  • international research collaboration
  • iran
  • political sanction
  • united states
  • health policy
  • health services research
  • public health

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Supplementary materials

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Seye Abimbola

  • Contributors All authors have contributed to each stage of manuscript design and preparation.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All discussed data is publically available. No additional data is available.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.