Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Developing a multisectoral National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS) to implement the International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) in Tanzania
  1. Janneth M Mghamba1,
  2. Ambrose O Talisuna2,
  3. Ludy Suryantoro3,
  4. Grace Elizabeth Saguti4,
  5. Martin Muita4,
  6. Muhammad Bakari1,
  7. Neema Rusibamayila1,
  8. Mohamed Ally1,
  9. Jubilate Bernard1,
  10. Richard Banda4,
  11. Maximillian Mapunda4,
  12. Rachel Eidex5,
  13. Rajesh Sreedharan3,
  14. Karen Sliter6,
  15. Simo Nikkari7,
  16. Sohel Saikat3,
  17. Glenn P M Lolong3,
  18. Paul Verboom3,
  19. Ali Ahmed Yahaya2,
  20. Stella Chungong3,
  21. Guenael Rodier3,
  22. Ibrahima Soce Fall2
  1. 1 Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
  2. 2 African Regional Office, World Health Organisation, Brazzaville, Congo
  3. 3 Headquarters, World Health Organisation, Geneve, Switzerland
  4. 4 Country Office, World Health Organisation, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
  5. 5 US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  6. 6 United States Department of Agriculture, Brussels, Belgium
  7. 7 Finnish Defence Forces, Centres for Military Medicine and Bio-threat Preparedness, Helsinki, Finland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sohel Saikat; saikats{at}who.int

Abstract

The Ebola outbreak in West Africa precipitated a renewed momentum to ensure global health security through the expedited and full implementation of the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) in all WHO member states. The updated IHR (2005) Monitoring and Evaluation Framework was shared with Member States in 2015 with one mandatory component, that is, States Parties annual reporting to the World Health Assembly (WHA) on compliance and three voluntary components: Joint External Evaluation (JEE), After Action Reviews and Simulation Exercises. In February 2016, Tanzania, was the first country globally to volunteer to do a JEE and the first to use the recommendations for priority actions from the JEE to develop a National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS) by February 2017. The JEE demonstrated that within the majority of the 47 indicators within the 19 technical areas, Tanzania had either ‘limited capacity’ or ‘developed capacity’. None had ‘sustainable capacity’. With JEE recommendations for priority actions, recommendations from other relevant assessments and complementary objectives, Tanzania developed the NAPHS through a nationwide consultative and participatory process. The 5-year cost estimate came out to approximately US$86.6 million (22 million for prevent, 50 million for detect, 4.8 million for respond and 9.2 million for other IHR hazards and points of entry). However, with the inclusion of vaccines for zoonotic diseases in animals increases the cost sevenfold. The importance of strong country ownership and committed leadership were identified as instrumental for the development of operationally focused NAPHS that are aligned with broader national plans across multiple sectors. Key lessons learnt by Tanzania can help guide and encourage other countries to translate their JEE priority actions into a realistic costed NAPHS for funding and implementation for IHR (2005).

  • health policy
  • public health
  • review

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Seye Abimbola

  • Contributors JMM, AOT, GES, MM, MB, NR, MA, JB, RB, MM, RS, RE conducted both the JEE and NAPHs. SN, KS conducted the JEE. SL, SS, PV conducted the NAPHS. ISF, GR, SC, AHY supervised the JEE and NAPHS. All authors contributed to the manuscript, read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Author note The approval for publication of findings (JEE, NAPHS and associated process) including authorship of Tanzania Government Officials was obtained from the Ministry of Health Tanzania and its Chief Medical Officer.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.