Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Prenatal and perinatal risk factors for disability in a rural Nepali birth cohort
  1. Edward J N Haworth1,
  2. Kirti M Tumbahangphe2,
  3. Anthony Costello3,4,
  4. Dharma Manandhar2,
  5. Dhruba Adhikari2,
  6. Bharat Budhathoki2,
  7. Dej Krishna Shrestha2,
  8. Khadka Sagar2,
  9. Michelle Heys1,4
  1. 1Great Ormond Street UCL Institute for Child Health, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2Mother and Infant Research Activities, Kathmandu, Nepal
  3. 3Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health (MCA), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  4. 4UCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Edward J N Haworth; haworth{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background Improving newborn health remains a global health priority. Little however is known about the neurodevelopmental consequences for survivors of complications in pregnancy, labour and the neonatal period in in low-income countries outside of small selective and typically urban facility studies. We ask which antenatal, birth and neonatal factors are associated with disability in childhood in a large community birth cohort from rural Nepal.

Methods 6436 infants were recruited during a cluster randomised control trial (RCT) of participatory women's groups (ISRCTN31137309), of whom 6075 survived beyond 28 days. At mean age of 11∙5 years (range 9.5–13.1), 4219 children (27% lost to follow-up) were available for disability screening which was conducted by face-to-face interview using the Module on Child Functioning and Disability produced by the Washington Group/UNICEF. Hypothesised risk factors for disability underwent multivariable regression modelling.

Findings Overall prevalence of disability was 7.4%. Maternal underweight (OR 1.44 (95% CI 1.01–2.08)), maternal cohabitation under 16 years of age (OR 1.50 (1.13–2.00)), standardised infant weight at 1 month (OR 0.82 (0.71–0.95)) and reported infant diarrhoea and vomiting in the first month (OR 2.48 (1.58–3.89)) were significantly associated with disability adjusted for trial allocation. The majority of hypothesised risk factors, including prematurity, were not significant.

Interpretation Proxies for early marriage and low birth weight and a measure of maternal undernutrition were associated with increased odds of disability. The lack of association of most other recognised risk factors for adverse outcome and disability may be due to survival bias.

  • child health
  • Paediatrics
  • cohort study
  • epidemiology
  • health policy

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors EJNH and MH designed and interpreted this current analysis and wrote this paper. AC and DM designed the original study and participated in the follow up study design. MH, KMT, DA, BB, DKS and KS designed the follow up study and oversaw data collection. All authors reviewed the final draft of the paper and approved the decision to submit for publication.

  • Funding This study was funded by a Wellcome Trust strategic award. Ref: 085417/Z/08/Z, Project Title:'Population Science of Maternal and Child Survival'. MH was funded during this study as an AcademicClinical Lecturer by the National Institute for Health Research, UK.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval Ethical approval for the study was obtained both from Nepal Health Research Council and the University College London research ethics committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.