This paper draws attention to the value of informal learning in developing leadership competencies in a district finance team, with some insights into the broader district. In order to gauge the complexities that participants face in the health system, a brief overview if given over some structural constraints and daily challenges in terms of financial management which is also closely linked to other support functions such as procurement and IT. Leadership involves being able to confront such complexities, and going against all odds. To facilitate this, it was critical that leadership competencies discussed in table 1 were developed. Two informal learning strategies, namely, the importance of learning from others (delegation, communication) and team-based learning are discussed.
DHS constraints
Under decentralisation, sufficient power and autonomy is meant to be transferred to the lower levels of the health system, particularly the DHS. A number of participants highlighted difficulties associated with certain support-side functions and processes (financial management which is also closely linked to procurement and IT), particularly described as being linked to limited power or authority delegated to the district level. The main challenges discussed in relation to financial management included bureaucratic processes, accessing the available resources (budget), delayed procurement and difficulties around IT. One of the reasons for continued centralisation was that for a certain period of time, the Provincial Treasury Department placed the Provincial Department of Health (DoH) under administration due to overexpenditure—strict control measures over resources were put in place, all requests and budgets had to be approved by Treasury, instead of just the DoH. Centralisation of support-side functions such as creating purchase orders, approval to use funds, IT equipment plans and infrastructure plans were also centralised functions.
Participants noted that the listed structural constraints (centralisation and inadequate delegation/authority) affected district support-side functions. A key challenge raised by participants was difficulty in accessing the budget—available financial resources, associated with bureaucratic processes/provincial approval. For example, one participant mentioned how he had drawn up infrastructure plans for storage space of medications over a decade ago. However, the budget remains controlled by another provincial department, which made it difficult to have plans approved. Inaccessibility to available financial resources was echoed by number of other participants in HR, IT and even health programmes.
Delayed approval of procurement orders by central levels also impacted service delivery;Dry dispensary, basic items such as needles and bandages are often out-of-stock at many facilities. We were told that the purchase of these items now requires provincial approval. I submitted all the documents and have been following-up, however, these requests have still has not been approved. The clinics do not have these necessities. This results in unnecessary referrals to higher levels, example hospitals, when these services could have easily been carried out at a lower level, that is, the clinic level (mid-level manager 1).
Regarding IT, staff in finance explained daily tasks were severely impacted by slow network connectivity and a lack of IT equipment—‘severely impeding our ability to carry out tasks and meet deadlines’. It was noted that there was no internet connectivity and a minimal amount of IT equipment within the district and at the subdistrict level and this also hampered communication via emails within and beyond the district. These are just some of the challenges which emerged from the doctoral study which offers more in-depth insight and analysis of financial management; however, some of these findings have been outlined to provide some context to the structural constraints which exists and its impact on district-level functioning. Employing some of the informal learning strategies, discussed below was one way of developing leadership competencies which enabled finance staff to deal with such constraints in a district setting.
Informal learning in the workplace
Findings revealed that informal learning in the broader district was fostered through learning from superiors or through team-based strategies;
Strategy 1: learning from other leaders—the art of delegation and communication
A few of the participants offered accounts of how SA's racially segregated past (apartheid) provided a strict and deadline-driven environment with little room for innovation in the health sector. Non-Caucasians employed in the health sector faced discrimination in terms of job placements and lower wages. Yet, despite SA's difficult circumstances, the district manager recounted how she was shaped by the rigid apartheid system (which was considered to be militant and punitive) and how she learnt on-the-job through interaction with her supervisors.I'm one of the few black nurses who worked in this area under apartheid. Apartheid was good and bad, it was a struggle but it also taught us to work hard and know what you're aiming for. It also taught me that deadlines are important, even today I make sure that people don't go beyond their deadlines… When I was appointed in a senior position, I was struggling to do everything and it's my manager that taught me you cannot do everything. I learnt from that day that delegation is not a bad thing and it provides a challenge to those below and it's encouraging, it shows them that you believe they can do it (district manager).
In turn, staff learnt the art of delegation from the district manager and incorporated it into their own units/divisions —for example, in the PHC and procurement unit, but particularly of interest in the finance unit. The delegation of tasks was seen as a means of learning, personal development and motivation;Another positive thing about our manager is that she allows you to be a manager; she provides challenges and I learnt a lot (senior manager 1).
My manager's doors are always open; they are like work fathers, always trying to teach you. They give you opportunities and challenges and even take you to some meetings to learn and see how things happen (Lower level manager 2).
The district manager also placed emphasis on establishing good relationships with staff through communication—either through meetings or through one-on-one discussions to provide feedback. Managers across the district described how they learnt such communication skills from the district manager:I learnt from the district manager, she's one of the managers' who has continuously given me feedback and now I have implemented this—I also give feedback to staff below me (senior manager 1).
Learning from other managers, filtered down to even lower level staff, junior participants in finance acknowledged learning how to manage others and to prioritise from their supervisors;When I started off in finance, he showed me how to prioritise tasks…Being a manager is difficult at times, but my manager taught me to keep a diary and record everything, both the positive to acknowledge good work and the negative so that you have proof when it is time for performance management. I learnt all of this from him, he is a very good supervisor, and he is a leader (lower level manager 1).
Strategy 2: team-based learning—exploring the financial management unit
Finance managers in particular revealed how they introduced informal learning through the broader district environment and went on to fostering teamwork in their unit as well as stressed the importance of empowering others:We as managers are judged by the team we have created. It is important that we ensure that we develop them; we encourage them to learn new tasks and functions and even encourage them to go the extra mile (mid-level manager 2).
Often managers encouraged staff to work together on tasks—this allowed staff to learn different tasks, support and advise each other (peer-learning). In addition, each staff member was trained on every finance-related task, this provided knowledge of other team member functions, allowed staff to stand-in if others resigned or went on leave. The entire finance unit with the exception of the managers were placed together in one open-planned office space. The close proximity of staff members enabled them to interact, support and advise each other which further enacted informal learning. This approach allowed for individual and team learning, personal development and teamwork:The finance manager encouraged us to learn everything (all tasks) in finance, so that you understand the entire department, you are not limited and it will be easy to grow (lower level manager 1).
We work together as a team quite often; we really do have teamwork. For instance, there are many clinics and budget capturing is quite intensive. The finance managers will request that we work together on this task, we put our own work aside, and assist each other until the task is complete, then we go back to our own tasks (lower level manager 1).
The learning environment together with staff being given the responsibility and space to implement activities (through delegation) allowed staff to appreciate challenges and perceive them as learning curves. Informal practices was one mechanism which contributed to developing a cadre of leaders who learnt from their superiors and developed competencies such as delegating as a means of empowering and motivating staff, communicate/manage others, prioritising and fostering teamwork. Further results indicate that this cadre went on to display competency 2 in table 1 (problem solving and analysis), coping strategies, solutions and innovations and were able to express agency when addressing the DHS constraints listed earlier.
Solution-driven and motivated leadership
This section outlines how the informal learning environment, coupled with motivation and teamwork were linked to the specific competency (problem solving and analysis) drawing on examples from the broader district and a few examples specific to the finance team. There was an instance where a clinic did not have adequate storage space for medications and there was no budget for building additional space. The issue was escalated to the district level, where one of the managers said, ‘there is no place for excuses, we can work around this’. Petty cash was used to purchase the material and one of the medical practitioners who knew how to build or repair items was requested to assist. He placed shelves throughout one room of the clinic to maximise space for the storage of some medications. Other cases involved providing a few short-term solutions or coping strategies. Procurement staff who were also motivated by the district manager's delegation strategies (described above) and being within this solution-driven environment explained that even though it was difficult to keep to prescribed levels of stock as they had minimal storage space; they ordered less more often or even allowed for borrowing of equipment and stock between facilities to ensure that service delivery remains unaffected.
Problems with IT connectivity were described as ‘frustrating’ by most staff; some said that it was even difficult to carry out their daily tasks as they are unable to access necessary systems due to slow connectivity. Observations through job shadowing of some finance staff, confirmed how staff would make appointments at the provincial level to make use of the computer facilities to complete tasks. The finance managers explained their problem-based coping strategies, that is, how they worked around these IT constraints;We don't limit staff, sometimes the systems are down. We arrange and allow for them to work at another hospital or clinic in the area where the systems are functional. Some of them even go to use the systems at province (mid-level manager 2).
In the broader district as well as in the finance unit, managers (senior and junior) reported difficult relationships with staff below/demotivated staff. Participants displayed competency 1 and 5 from table 1 in particular (people management and empowerment as well as communication);As a manager it is important to be strong minded and also accommodative, you need to take different personalities, strengths and weaknesses into cognisance. As a manager there's no way that you cannot be autocratic at times. One needs to strike a balance between democracy and autocracy. There are times that you have to push people, some individuals are like wheel barrows once you leave them in a certain place, you will still find them there. So you have no choice but to nudge and push them to meet their deadlines and encourage a high quality of work (district manager).
Being a manager is like being a parent, you can be angry at your child today but at the end of the day he or she is still your child and you will need to manage that child whether you like it or not. It is important to sit down and discuss the issue and provide feedback. There are other times when we as managers are also wrong and we apologise. We have an open door policy, to come and discuss work and personal issues. There will always be issues you know though we try to handle them as if we are parents instead of managers (mid-level manager 2).
One way that this cadre of leaders motivated staff was by finding innovative strategies, for example, in the finance unit, managers related that simple strategies such as acknowledging good work, went a long way in motivating staff. Another initiative which played a role in staff motivation was the district's annual awards ceremony. There was an awards committee and a template which managers used to track progress, and included indicators such as hard work, punctuality and innovation of any individuals or teams at the subdistrict and district level. Individuals and teams were nominated and an awards committee organised and provides oversight around the process. The overall winner from the subdistrict also had the opportunity to be selected for the district award. At a district level, members based within this positive learning environment and across various units including, finance, IT, procurement and on the service delivery side shared their views on the awards ceremony;I won the award last year. I only received a certificate, but it means a lot to be acknowledged. I believe it doesn't always have to be a monetary reward, but just somebody acknowledging that what you are doing is good (senior manager 2).
I think it is very good. It encourages a person to perform. It is very important in an organisation to acknowledge good performance; if there are no rewards then we might not be as innovative or creative (lower level staff).
Despite the learning and solution-driven environment created as well as displays of agency, health systems are complex and continue to be inherently affected by structural influences. For example, individuals in the district try to find solutions (express their agency) or keep following up on documents and processes. However, the lack of authority and external influences were found to impede agency. A few of the managers specifically raised concerns around how decision-making authority was transferred in theory and not in practice. Some district participants gave details of how they carried out necessary disciplinary processes in line with guidelines, legislations and rules and with the assistance of district HR. There were some cases where individuals were dismissed and the district's decision was overturned by the unions and province. In essence as one participant stated:The challenge when you're based at a district is that you can be innovative but the reality is that you always have to get permission from the province or national (senior manager 2).
Although similar levels of agency were not as eminent at a subdistrict level in comparison to the district level—informal learning strategies and teamwork were described as being difficult to extend. At a subdistrict level, a number of staff stated that due to many constraints it was more difficult to exercise agency. Some participants explained that their constraints also included IT and procurement challenges, however, in comparison to the district these challenges were further compounded by the lack of sufficient administrative capacity at a subdistrict level. Participants reported that they did try to find solutions such as communicating telephonically or via the mobile application (WhatsApp) or using personal resources (own laptop or collecting money to purchase own cleaning materials), however, systemic constraints made it difficult to be innovative/solution driven;We raised these issues with our managers, informally and through meetings, we tried to find solutions but it is difficult, nothing ever improves. We put through our submissions on time to the administrative officer, who takes the documents to the district office, but he doesn't have a computer or email address, it's difficult to follow-up, though we do follow-up, nothing happens, there is non-agency in government and that constrains us. When the time comes, we do not even have cleaning materials for our facilities (subdistrict staff 1).
Nonetheless, even with such constrains, participants at the district level, particularly in the finance team displayed how they continuously tried to push boundaries and find solutions. This is largely attributed to staff reporting being motivated through informal practices such as delegation (new opportunities) and continuous learning;It is a joy working here, you are not limited, you are allowed to spread your wings and grow, it is solely dependent on you whether you do so (mid-level manager 2).