Original Investigation
Pathogenesis and Treatment of Kidney Disease
An Economic Evaluation of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in CKD

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.07.015Get rights and content

Background

The objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of treating anemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to a low (9-10.9 g/dL), intermediate (11-12 g/dL), or high (>12 g/dL) hemoglobin level target compared with a strategy of managing anemia without ESAs.

Study Design

Cost-utility analysis.

Setting & Participants

Publicly funded health care system. Anemic patients with CKD, overall and stratified into dialysis-/non–dialysis-dependent subgroups.

Model, Perspective, & Timeframe

Decision analysis, health care payer, patient's lifetime.

Main Outcome

Cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

Results

For dialysis patients, compared with anemia management without ESAs, using ESAs to target a low hemoglobin level is associated with a cost per QALY of $96,270. Given a lack of direct trials comparing low and intermediate targets, significant uncertainty exists between these strategies. Treatment to a high hemoglobin target was always associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher costs compared with a low hemoglobin target. Results were similar in non–dialysis-dependent patients with CKD, with a cost per QALY for a low target compared with no ESA of $147,980.

Limitations

Given limitations in the available randomized controlled trials, we were able to model only 4 treatment strategies, balancing the need to consider relevant targets with the requirement for accurate estimates of clinical effect. We assumed that the efficacy of the different strategies would continue over a patient's lifetime.

Conclusions

Using ESAs to target a hemoglobin level >12 g/dL is associated with worse clinical outcomes and significant additional cost compared with using ESAs to target lower hemoglobin levels (9-12 g/dL). Given a lack of studies comparing low (9-10.9 g/dL) and intermediate (11-12 g/dL) hemoglobin targets for clinical outcomes, including quality of life, the most cost-effective hemoglobin level target within the range of 9-12 g/dL is uncertain, although aiming for higher targets within this range will lead to higher costs.

Section snippets

Study Design

We estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with treatment using ESAs to target different hemoglobin level targets compared with a strategy of managing anemia without ESAs. A Markov process was used to model the cost and clinical outcomes for patients in 1-year intervals. We modeled cohorts of non–dialysis-dependent patients with CKD and dialysis patients separately. Fig 1 shows the model structure, with differences between the dialysis- and non–dialysis-dependent models

Patient Cohort Characteristics

Table 1 lists baseline characteristics of the dialysis and nondialysis patient cohorts used in base-case analyses. The dialysis cohort is substantially younger than the nondialysis cohort, with 50.2% older than 65 years compared with 83.1% of the nondialysis cohort older than 65 years.

Baseline Estimates

Baseline clinical estimates are listed in Table 2. Of note, clinical outcomes and costs associated with caring for non–dialysis-dependent patients with CKD are novel contributions to the published literature.

Discussion

This analysis shows that targeting ESA treatment to hemoglobin levels >12 g/dL is not associated with overall clinical benefit and results in significant additional cost, consistent with RCT data used to inform the analysis. Targeting treatment to hemoglobin levels in the range of 9-12 g/dL is preferred to high hemoglobin level targets, although the cost per QALY to achieve low and intermediate hemoglobin level targets compared with management without ESAs was at least $100,000 in virtually all

Acknowledgements

Support: This work was funded by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Dr Clement is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship award from the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation and from Alberta Innovates–Health Solutions (AI-HS), formerly the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Drs Manns and Tonelli are supported by AI-HS Health Scholar Awards, and Drs Hemmelgarn and Klarenbach are supported by AI-HS Population Health Investigator awards. Drs Manns,

References (61)

  • G.W. Torrance

    Utility approach to measuring health related quality of life

    J Chronic Dis

    (1987)
  • A. Laupacis et al.

    A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation

    Kidney Int

    (1996)
  • E. Ritz et al.

    Target level for hemoglobin correction in patients with diabetes and CKD: primary results of the Anemia Correction in Diabetes (ACORD) Study

    Am J Kidney Dis

    (2007)
  • H. Lee et al.

    Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: the impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access

    Am J Kidney Dis

    (2002)
  • K.W. Wyrwich et al.

    Heart Disease Expert PanelClinically important differences in health status for patients with heart disease: an expert consensus panel report

    Am Heart J

    (2004)
  • A. Besarab et al.

    The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin

    N Engl J Med

    (1998)
  • T.B. Drueke et al.

    Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • A.K. Singh et al.

    Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: 2007 update of hemoglobin target

    Am J Kidney Dis

    (2007)
  • A. Piccoli et al.

    A decision analysis comparing three dosage regimens of subcutaneous epoetin in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

    Pharmacoeconomics

    (1995)
  • Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies

    (2006)
  • Treatment of End-Stage Organ Failure in Canada, 1995-20042006 Annual Report

    (2006)
  • D. Cournoyer et al.

    Anti-erythropoietin antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia after treatment with recombinant erythropoietin products: recommendations for minimization of risk

    J Am Soc Nephrol

    (2004)
  • J. Bahlmann et al.

    Morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients with and without erythropoietin treatment: a controlled study

    Contrib Nephrol

    (1991)
  • W.M. Bennett

    A multicenter clinical trial of epoetin beta for anemia of end-stage renal disease

    J Am Soc Nephrol

    (1991)
  • Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin therapy on blood pressure in hemodialysis patients

    BMJ

    (1990)
  • H. Furuland et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of haemoglobin normalization with epoetin alfa in pre-dialysis and dialysis patients

    Nephrol Dial Transplant

    (2003)
  • J.S. Kaufman et al.

    Subcutaneous compared with intravenous epoetin in patients receiving hemodialysisDepartment of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Erythropoietin in Hemodialysis Patients

    N Engl J Med

    (1998)
  • H. Klinkmann et al.

    Adverse events of subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin therapy: results of a controlled multicenter European study

    Artif Organs

    (1993)
  • S. Kuriyama et al.

    Reversal of anemia by erythropoietin therapy retards the progression of chronic renal failure, especially in nondiabetic patients

    Nephron

    (1997)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Cost-effectiveness of treating chronic anemia with epoetin alfa among hemodialysis patients in the United States

      2012, Health Outcomes Research in Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      We included assumptions to test from 3 prior health economic models that assessed the cost-effectiveness of targeting higher Hb.21,22,32 The model from Clement et al22 was based on findings from a meta-analysis and associated poorer survival with Hb 11-12 g/dL versus Hb 9-10.9 g/dL. Such an assumption may be driven by the potential for increases in cardiovascular or thromboembolic risks as seen in clinical trials assessing higher Hb levels.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.07.015 on October 8, 2010.

    View full text