Elsevier

Acta Tropica

Volume 118, Issue 2, May 2011, Pages 110-117
Acta Tropica

Economic evaluation of Chagas disease screening of pregnant Latin American women and of their infants in a non endemic area

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.02.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Migration is a channel through which Chagas disease is imported, and vertical transmission is a channel through which the disease is spread in non-endemic countries. This study presents the economic evaluation of Chagas disease screening in pregnant women from Latin America and in their newborns in a non endemic area such as Spain. The economic impact of Chagas disease screening is tested through two decision models, one for the newborn and one for the mother, against the alternative hypothesis of no screening for either the newborn or the mother. Results show that the option “no test” is dominated by the option “test”. The cost effectiveness ratio in the “newborn model” was 22 €/QALYs gained in the case of screening and 125 €/QALYs gained in the case of no screening. The cost effectiveness ratio in the “mother model” was 96 €/QALYs gained in the case of screening and 1675 €/QALYs gained in the case of no screening. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis highlighted the reduction of uncertainty in the screening option. Threshold analysis assessed that even with a drop in Chagas prevalence from 3.4% to 0.9%, a drop in the probability of vertical transmission from 7.3% to 2.24% and with an increase of screening costs up to  €37.5, “test” option would still be preferred to “no test”. The current study proved Chagas screening of all Latin American women giving birth in Spain and of their infants to be the best strategy compared to the non-screening option and provides useful information for health policy makers in their decision making process.

Graphical abstract

. Chagas disease screening (“test” option) of all Latin American women giving birth in Spain, and of their infants, is more cost-effective compared to the “no test” option.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

► We modeled the economic evaluation of Chagas disease screening, and consequent treatment, of pregnant women from Latin America and, in case these are positive, of their newborns, in a non endemic area such as Spain. ► “Screening” resulted to be the most cost-effective strategy compared to “non-screening”. ► This result remained constant even with a substantial rise in screening costs and with a drop in the prevalence of the infection among pregnant women and in the probability of vertical transmission.

Introduction

Chagas disease is a parasitic disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi. The disease is endemic in Latin America and shows very heterogeneous levels of prevalence across, as well as within countries. The vector responsible for spreading the parasite is a bug living in the poor rural areas as well as in the outskirts of the main urban centres: this makes Chagas a disease of poorer people (WHO, 2002).

The acute infection, consisting in a self-limited febrile illness, is often unrecognized. The acute phase of the infection precedes the chronic phase. It is estimated that around 30–40% of chronically infected individuals will develop symptomatic heart or gastrointestinal diseases, usually between 10 and 25 years after contracting the infection. The indeterminate phase is the period of infection with neither symptoms nor signs of cardiac/gastrointestinal tract involvement. Around two thirds of the infected people remain in the indeterminate phase for life (Rassi et al., 2010).

The current treatment for Chagas disease consists in Benznidazole or Nifurtimox. The efficacy of these two drugs depends on the age of the patient, and on the time since the infection is established: best therapeutic results are shown in acute or recent infections, and cure rates close to 100% have been reported in children treated in the first year of life (Oliveira et al., 2010, Viotti et al., 2009). Beneficial effects of antiparasitic treatment in adult chronic infections remain debated (Sosa Estani et al., 1998).

Chagas disease is a public health issue in non-endemic countries as a consequence of a social phenomenon characterizing the same subset of poor people that are most exposed to Chagas disease in endemic areas: migration (Frank et al., 1997, Schmunis, 2007). Immigrants from Latin America are not the only potential victims of the disease. In non-endemic areas, transmission through blood derivates, organ transplant and through vertical transmission is an increasing problem (Munoz et al., 2007, Piron et al., 2008, Tibayrenc and Telleria, 2010). Spain is a frequent destination of immigration from Latin America. Currently, around 1.7 million migrants from endemic Latin-American countries live in Spain. The Bolivian community, the group most affected by Chagas disease, is composed of 236,048 immigrants and 103,291 of them are women of fertile age (Instituto Nacional Estadistica (INE))

The magnitude of Chagas disease in Spain has been shown in a study conducted at the maternity wards of two hospitals of Barcelona (Munoz et al., 2009). Results showed a prevalence of Chagas of 3.4% among Latin American pregnant women and a vertical transmission rate of 7.3%. Considering that 707,000 Latin American women of fertile age were present in Spain at the time of the study and assuming one pregnancy only per woman, the study highlighted the possibility to have around 1750 infected newborn over about 10 years.

Pregnancy and delivery of Latin American women living in Spain are crucial moments for the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) to detect and treat the disease: antenatal clinic attendance is one of the most certain contacts, often the only one, Latin American women experience with the SNHS (Gascon and Pinazo, 2008).

Because of the high variability of prevalence of the disease across and within endemic countries, it would be difficult to identify which women from Latin America should receive T. cruzi screening and which should not, by simply depending on their country of provenience. At the same time, many screening tests offer a cheap and precocious diagnosis of Chagas and, especially in infants, they allow to start an early treatment which could avoid almost all negative consequences of the progression of the disease later in life.

Just a few economic evaluations have been conducted on Chagas disease interventions (Basombrio et al., 1998, Castillo-Riquelme et al., 2008, Miyoshi et al., 1994, Vazquez-Prokopec et al., 2009, Wilson et al., 2005), with only one focusing on the economic aspects of congenital transmission in an endemic area (Billot et al., 2005).

This is the first study analysing the economic convenience of undertaking Chagas disease screening to all pregnant women from Latin America in a non endemic area, providing decision makers with a model able to assess which is the best option between screening or not screening. To do this, the current study aims to evaluate the convenience of undertaking Active Detection of the Infection (ADI) in all Latin American pregnant women in Spain when they attend the antenatal clinic (ANC) and if they have a positive result, then an ADI is repeated in their newborn. The intervention includes treatment to mother and children with positive screening results. Two decision models using epidemiological data with reference to the study conducted in Barcelona is estimated (Munoz et al., 2009). Economic data were collected at one of the hospitals where the vertical transmission study was undertaken. Both costs and benefits of the screening are considered. Benefits are the avoided costs, thanks to a precocious diagnosis, of treating Chagas disease sooner rather than later in life, when the disease would be much more developed.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

A cost-effectiveness analysis of the unique intervention consisting in Chagas disease screening and treatment in case of positive result, of Latin American pregnant women and of their infected children, was developed using two separate decision models (Ades et al., 1999, Claxton et al., 2002, Drummond et al., 2008, Gold, 1996). The intervention towards the mother and the child was split into two models in this economic evaluation for methodological reasons only. Specifically, some parameters

Results

“No test” is the dominated strategy in both decision trees. Table 3 reports the results of the cost-effectiveness analysis of the newborn's model and of the mother's model. Cost-effectiveness ratio of the strategy “test” in the newborn's model was 22 €/QALYs gained against 125 €/QALYs gained of the strategy “no test”. Cost effectiveness ratio of the strategy “test” in the mother's model was 96 €/QALYs gained while this was 1675 €/QALYs gained in the “no test” strategy.

On average, undertaking the

Discussion

This study shows that undertaking ADI of Chagas disease at the antenatal clinics of all Latin American pregnant women and, if they are positive, to repeat the test in their newborns is more cost-effective than not undertaking it. Not only is the “test” option cheaper for the health system than the option “no test”, but also the quality of life insured to patients, expressed in terms of QALYs, considerably increases.

Furthermore, confidence intervals of the main outcomes estimated through Monte

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Contributions

ES and JG conceived of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. ES analysed the data. JM, MJP, EP, JS and PA participated in the design of the study and reviewed and edited all previous drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Ned Hayes for his useful comments and to Janifer Quick for reviewing the latest version of the manuscript.

References (41)

  • D. Akhavan

    Analise de Custo-Efectivadade do Programa de Controle da Doença de Chagas no Brasil

    (1996)
  • C. Bern et al.

    An estimate of the burden of Chagas disease in the United States

    Clin. Infect. Dis.

    (2009)
  • C. Billot et al.

    Cost effectiveness study of a control program of congenital Chagas disease in Bolivia

    Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop.

    (2005)
  • S.B. Blanco et al.

    Congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi: an operational outline for detecting and treating infected infants in north-western Argentina

    Trop. Med. Int. Health

    (2000)
  • A.H. Briggs

    Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models

    Pharmacoeconomics

    (2000)
  • A.H. Briggs et al.

    Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease

    Med. Decis. Making

    (2002)
  • A.H. Briggs et al.

    Constructing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an evaluation of parametric and non-parametric techniques using Monte Carlo simulation

    Stat. Med.

    (1999)
  • M. Castillo-Riquelme et al.

    The costs of preventing and treating Chagas disease in Colombia

    PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.

    (2008)
  • M.C. Di Pentima et al.

    Prevalence of antibody to Trypanosoma cruzi in pregnant Hispanic women in Houston

    Clin. Infect. Dis.

    (1999)
  • M. Drummond et al.

    Economic evaluation of health interventions

    BMJ

    (2008)
  • Cited by (87)

    • Should obstetricians working in non-endemic countries care about emerging tropical diseases?

      2021, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This low access to diagnosis is mainly related to the absence of large-scale screening programs, despite the WHO recommendations to globalize the efforts for CD control and elimination [1]. Two previous studies have already demonstrated that CD screening in Latin American migrants at primary health-care centers in Europe is cost-effective [4,5] and another has recently reported that universal screening in the US is cost saving even at $60 per woman screened [6]. Nevertheless, only three autonomous communities in Spain (Catalonia, Galicia and Valencia) and one region in Italy (Tuscany) are currently testing pregnant women coming from CD endemic areas [20].

    • Migration Medicine

      2019, Infectious Disease Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Screening for Chagas disease among Latin American migrants from endemic countries is cost-effective and is particularly important for pregnant women and women of child-bearing age to prevent congenital infection. Screening and treatment of children and adolescents is important due to high treatment efficacy.80,81 Malaria in nonendemic countries occurs mainly among migrants who travel back to their countries of origin to visit friends and relatives (VFR).82,83

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text