SeriesThe comparative cost-effectiveness of an equity-focused approach to child survival, health, and nutrition: a modelling approach
Introduction
Substantial recent global progress in reducing childhood mortality and undernutrition has been accompanied by increasing within-country inequities.1 For example, 18 of 26 countries with the largest decreases in under-5 mortality show a simultaneous widening of the mortality gap between the least and most deprived wealth quintiles.1, 2 The global burden of childhood mortality, morbidity, and undernutrition is now increasingly concentrated in the most deprived and underserved populations within countries,1, 2, 3 partly as a result of inequitable coverage of key maternal and child health and nutrition interventions.4, 5
Much of the encouraging progress in reducing childhood mortality and undernutrition can be attributed to the identification and roll out of highly effective evidence-based interventions over the past decades.6 Failing to ensure that marginalised communities benefit from these improvements in knowledge threatens the achievement of the fourth Millennium Development Goal (MDG). Yet countries as diverse as Brazil,7, 8 Chile,9 Mozambique,10, 11 Niger,12, 13 and Thailand14 have shown that a reduction of both overall child mortality and inequities is possible. Advances in technology and community-based programming have generated innovative strategies with the potential to reach the underserved in a cost-effective manner.15, 16 The convergence of these trends raises the possibility that the perceived trade-off between equity and efficiency no longer applies for child nutrition and survival—that an equity-focused approach that prioritises services for the poorest and most marginalised can be more effective and cost effective than mainstream approaches that incrementally increase coverage from the easier to the more difficult to reach populations.
We aimed to build a case for this hypothesis using a mathematical modelling approach,17 noting its use to predict the effect and cost-effectiveness of several maternal and child-health strategies.18, 19, 20, 21, 22
Section snippets
Study design
We compared two strategic approaches to reducing under-5 mortality and malnutrition across 14 countries and one province: one approach that we have labelled a mainstream approach to delivering services and the other, labelled as an equity-focused approach that prioritised operational strategies to reach the most deprived populations. Figure 1 provides a schematic description of the main factors we assessed that affect the ability of health services to reduce child deaths and undernutrition. On
Modelling outcomes
The model suggests that the equity-focused approach results in higher increases in coverage of high-impact interventions among the most deprived populations, as compared with the least deprived. These findings were consistent across different country typologies with increased coverage ranging from 104% in the most deprived areas versus 75% in the least deprived areas in type A countries to 100% in the most deprived areas versus 57% in the least deprived areas in type C countries.
Figure 4 shows
Conclusions
Even though substantial gains in survival can be made through increased investments with existing delivery strategies, our model supports the contention that across a wide range of countries, a focus on reaching the most deprived populations will save more lives and avert more episodes of stunting and decrease health inequities within countries. Our model also suggests that focusing on the most deprived is the most cost-effective way to deliver services to both narrow the gaps in access to
References (48)
- et al.
Levels and trends in child mortality, 1990–2009
Lancet
(2010) - et al.
Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in Countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries
Lancet
(2012) - et al.
How many child deaths can we prevent this year?
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges
Lancet
(2011) - et al.
Mathematical models in the evaluation of health programmes
Lancet
(2011) - et al.
Estimation of potential effects of improved community-based drug provision, to augment health-facility strengthening, on maternal mortality due to post-partum haemorrhage and sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa: an equity-effectiveness model
Lancet
(2009) - et al.
What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival
Lancet
(2008) - et al.
Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis
Lancet
(2010) - et al.
Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000
Lancet
(2012) Progress for children: achieving the MDGs with equity (No. 9)
(2010)
United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation 2011. Levels and trends in child mortality. Report 2011
Towards universal health coverage: the role of within-country wealth-related inequality in 28 countries in sub-Saharan Africa
Bull World Health Organ
Narrowing socioeconomic inequality in child stunting: the Brazilian experience, 1974–2007
Bull World Health Organ
Tackling health inequities in Chile: maternal, newborn, infant, and child mortality between 1990 and 2004
Am J Public Health
Mocambique, inquerito demografico e de saude, 1997
Mocambique, inquerito demografico e de saude, 2003
Enquête démographique et de santé, Niger 1998
Enquête démographique et de santé et à indicateurs multiples du Niger 2006
Equity in maternal and child health in Thailand
Bull World Health Organ
Health and nutrition of children: equity and social determinants
Strategies to improve health coverage and narrow the equity gap in child survival, health, and nutrition
Lancet
Methods to assess the costs and health effects of interventions for improving health in developing countries
BMJ
Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries
BMJ
Modeling the effects of different infant feeding strategies on infant survival and mother-to-child transmission of HIV
Am J Public Health
Cited by (66)
Can inequity in healthcare be bridged in LMICs – Multicentre experience from thalassemia day care centres in India
2017, Pediatric Hematology Oncology JournalPopulation-level linear growth faltering in low-income and middle-income countries
2017, The Lancet Global HealthChild Health and Survival in a Changing World
2017, Pediatric Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Better-off segments of the population generally uptake interventions first, followed by a trickling down of use among more vulnerable segments. Recent data demonstrate that with the same investment level, pro-poor implementation strategies result in more effective overall coverage rates and reductions in inequities.42,43 An analysis of 63 countries representing 90% of the global child mortality burden reveals that one-quarter of deaths could be averted if national coverage rates of essential health interventions were brought up to the level of the wealthiest households, thereby averting 1.3 million child deaths.35
Socio-economic and ethnic disparities of malnutrition in all its forms in Guatemala
2020, Public Health NutritionEquity in Economic Evaluations of Early Childhood Development Interventions in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review
2023, Maternal and Child Health Journal