Case ID | Case study setting | Observation period (days) | Interviews (n) | Monitoring indicators | |
Per case | Per country | Per country | |||
Burkina Faso 1 | Rural setting Low implementation* Staffing: 3 HFWs Catchment population: 11 011 | 10 | 3 HFWs 3 CHWs 3 postpartum women | 4 policymakers 3 MOMI implementers | By month by facility:
|
Burkina Faso 2 | Rural setting High implementation Staffing: 3 HFWs Catchment population: 10 175 | 10 | 3 HFWs 3 CHWs 3 postpartum women | ||
Burkina Faso 3 | Urban setting High implementation Staffing: 20 HFWs Catchment population: 17 093 | 10 | 5 HFWs 3 CHWs 4 postpartum women | ||
Burkina Faso 4 | Urban setting Low implementation Staffing: 17 HFWs Catchment population: 16 114 | 10 | 5 HFWs 4 CHWs 3 postpartum women | ||
Kenya 1 | Rural setting High implementation Staffing: 9 HFWs +4 CHWs helping at the facility Catchment population: 24 821 | 10 | 2 HFWs 3 CHWs 4 postpartum women | 2 policymakers 4 MOMI implementers | By month by facility:
|
Kenya 2 | Rural setting High implementation Staffing: 3 HFWs+3 CHWs helping at the facility Catchment population: 7538 | 10 | 1 HFWs 3 CHWs 4 postpartum women | ||
Kenya 3 | Urban setting Low implementation Staffing: 12 HFWs +2 CHWs helping at the facility Catchment population: 16 274 | 10 | 2 HFWs 3 CHWs 4 postpartum women | ||
Kenya 4 | Rural setting Low implementation Staffing: 5 HFWs +4 CHWs helping at the facility Catchment population: 13 066 | 10 | 2 HFWs 3 CHWs 3 postpartum women | ||
Malawi 1 | Urban setting High implementation Staffing: 28 HFWs Catchment population: 58 061 | 9 | 5 HFWs 2 CHWs 3 postpartum women | 6 policymakers 3 MOMI interviews | By month by facility:
|
Malawi 2 | Peri-urban setting Low implementation Staffing: 7 HFWs Catchment population: 48 895 | 10 | 3 HFWs 2 CHWs 3 postpartum women | ||
Malawi 3 | Rural setting Low implementation Staffing: 4 HFWs Catchment population: 14 669 | 10 | 2 HFWs 2 CHWs 3 postpartum women | ||
Malawi 4 | Rural setting Low implementation Staffing: 3 HFWs Catchment population: 15 280 | 12 | 2 HFWs 2 CHWs 3 postpartum women | ||
Mozambique 1 | Rural setting Low implementation Staffing: 3 HFWs Catchment population: 21 452 | 9 | 2 HFWs 3 CHWs 3 postpartum women | 6 policymakers 5 MOMI interviews | By month by facility:
|
Mozambique 2 | Rural setting High implementation Staffing: 6 HFWs Catchment population: 22 310 | 10 | 3 HFWs 2 CHWs 3 postpartum women | ||
Mozambique 3 | Rural setting Low implementation Staffing: 44 HFWs Catchment population: 36 039 | 15 | 4 HFWs 2 CHWs 3 postpartum women | ||
Mozambique 4 | Rural setting High implementation Staffing: 8 HFWs Catchment population: 6007 | 9 | 2 HFWs 3 postpartum women |
Case studies’ data were supplemented with the analysis of three work packages reports, minutes of four Project Management Team meetings, field visits reports (five in Burkina Faso, three in Kenya, Malawi and Mozambique), minutes of Policy Advisory Board meetings (three in Burkina Faso, Kenya and Mozambique, two in Malawi), event logs in all sites, minutes of four Participatory Evaluation Workshops that took place after the case studies evaluation (one in each country).
*Level of implementation as perceived by the local MOMI implementers before case studies evaluation.
BMI, body mass index; CHW, community health worker; HFW, health facility worker; MOMI, Missed Opportunities in Maternal and Infant Health; PPC, postpartum care.