Table 3

Generalised estimating equations predicting SRQ-20 scores

 SRQ-20 negative affect scoreSRQ-20 somatic symptom scoresTotal SRQ-20 score
βSE95% Wald CIβSE95% Wald CIβSE95% Wald CI
Lower, upperLower, upperLower, upper
Step 1: main variables
 (Intercept)†0.780.140.51 to 1.05*1.680.171.36 to 2.01*2.340.281.79 to 2.89*
 Site 1, 2, 3 vs 4 (index)0.710.160.40 to 1.01*3.510.173.17 to 3.86*4.270.303.68 to 4.87*
 Outreach vs hospital (index)0.330.130.07 to 0.58*0.810.160.49 to 1.14*1.220.270.68 to 1.76*
 Change in visual acuity‡0.980.110.76 to 1.20*0.940.110.71 to 1.16*2.122.101.71 to 2.53*
 Change in paid work hours per day−0.0020.001−0.003 to −0.00005*−0.0040.0009−0.006 to −0.002*−0.0060.002−0.009 to −0.003*
Step 2: including demographics
 Female vs male (index)0.400.160.10 to 0.71*1.140.190.78 to 1.51*1.640.330.10 to 2.27*
 Postschool education vs no postschool education (index)−0.520.25−1.00 to −0.03*−0.330.37−1.07 to 0.40−0.990.56−2.08 to 0.11
 Married vs not married (index)−0.070.19−0.44 to 0.31−0.150.23−0.61 to 0.31−0.100.39−0.87 to 0.67
 Age−0.0020.01−0.02 to 0.010.020.0090.01 to 0.04*0.020.02−0.01 to 0.05
 Change in unpaid work hours per day−0.140.03−0.19 to −0.09*−0.210.04−0.27 to −0.14*−0.380.05−0.49 to −0.28*
Step 3: interaction
 Change in visual acuity×change in paid work (interaction)0.010.03−0.05 to 0.070.050.030.00 to 0.110.050.05−0.05 to 0.15
  • *p<0.05.

  • †Negative coefficients indicate an increase in the respective variable alongside a decrease in the respective SRQ-20 score.

  • ‡Lower values for visual acuity correspond to better visual acuity.

  • SRQ-20, Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20.