Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Epidemiology of antibiotic-resistant wound infections from six countries in Africa
  1. Peggy S Lai1,2,3,
  2. Lisa M Bebell4,5,
  3. Carron Meney3,
  4. Linda Valeri2,
  5. Michelle C White3
  1. 1 Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  3. 3 Africa Bureau, Mercy Ships, Cotonou, Benin
  4. 4 Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  5. 5 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Peggy S Lai; pslai{at}hsph.harvard.edu

Abstract

Introduction Little is known about the antimicrobial susceptibility of common bacteria responsible for wound infections from many countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods We performed a retrospective review of microbial isolates collected based on clinical suspicion of wound infection between 2004 and 2016 from Mercy Ships, a non-governmental organisation operating a single mobile surgical unit in Benin, Congo, Liberia, Madagascar, Sierra Leone and Togo. Antimicrobial resistant organisms of interest were defined as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. Generalised mixed-effects models accounting for repeated isolates in a patient, potential clustering by case mix for each field service, age, gender and country were used to test the hypothesis that rates of antimicrobial resistance differed between countries.

Results 3145 isolates from repeated field services in six countries were reviewed. In univariate analyses, the highest proportion of MRSA was found in Benin (34.6%) and Congo (31.9%), while the lowest proportion was found in Togo (14.3%) and Madagascar (14.5%); country remained a significant predictor in multivariate analyses (P=0.002). In univariate analyses, the highest proportion of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae was found in Benin (35.8%) and lowest in Togo (14.3%) and Madagascar (16.3%). Country remained a significant predictor for antimicrobial-resistant isolates in multivariate analyses (P=0.009).

Conclusion A significant proportion of isolates from wound cultures were resistant to first-line antimicrobials in each country. Though antimicrobial resistance isolates were not verified in a reference laboratory and these data may not be representative of all regions of the countries studied, differences in the proportion of antimicrobial-resistant isolates and resistance profiles between countries suggest site-specific surveillance should be a priority and local antimicrobial resistance profiles should be used to guide empiric antibiotic selection.

  • epidemiology
  • infections
  • diseases
  • disorders
  • injuries
  • hospital-based study

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Seye Abimbola

  • Contributors PSL: conception and design. PSL, LMB and MCW: drafting of work and/or revising for important intellectual content. All authors: acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data.

  • Funding There is no direct funding for this work. PSL reports salary support from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH-NIEHS K23ES023700). LMB reports salary support from the Charles H. Hood Foundation and a KL2/Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training award (an appointed KL2 award) from Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award KL2 TR001100).

  • Disclaimer The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers, or the National Institutes of Health.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval Mercy Ships Institutional Review Board (protocol no. MS2015-006).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.